Sex Art (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- One of the most technically-impressive, female-friendly, somewhat-artsy, websites on the internet.
- A more sexual version of Met-Art from Met-Art.
- Top-tier female models, including some favorites from Met-Art doing things they don't do on Met-Art.
- Very good fetish content, especially clothing fetishes.
- Production values are so high you might think you're watching a blockbuster Hollywood film.
- Photos and videos are both well-represented. Will go further in BL.
- Navigation is excellent and usually straight-forward.
- If you're into artsy hardcore they have quite a few sets where the models wear clothing and even partial masks to add to the plot.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of max).
- Not surprising to me but the solo sets are my favorites on here and should be joined by solo fans just for those.
- At this point, has a lot of content.
- Updates daily |
| Cons: |
- It's going to be too artsy for some. Some are going to say, "Why are you covering that pretty model's face?"
- The hardcore sets are hit or miss, some are very good and others are average at best.
- Those live girl ads. |
| Bottom Line: |
It seems fitting that I review Sex Art after reviewing X-Art last week. I've noted before on nearly every site owned or managed by Met-Art that you're going to have trouble finding much to complain about. Sex Art is the same way. Just pulling out numbers, resolutions, it's very impressive to see how much work they put into their site and content. I get the feeling they have someone who is live on each set and this person is OCD, they go around making sure every single object in the room is perfect, nothing distracting is going on and that appeals to me to a point. It also can become boring.
I still don't understand why Met-Art started Sex Art then came out with Met Art X. I'm pretty sure Met Art X is just solo masturbation but Sex Art has that too. Get the OCD person in there. Things are getting confusing. I'm going to do the numbers first because that's where Sex Art is at its best.
1,001 films as they call them, scenes, videos to most. Their lowest available high resolution is 1080p dating back to film #1. There are around 250 films with the 4K option, too. Each of these films can be downloaded in resolutions from 270p, 360p, 720p, 1080p and 4K if newer. They are some of the crispest videos I've watched. Sound is good and clear, too.
1,400 photo sets, roughly 4500 long end resolution, the amount of photos does vary from maybe 70 to 150. They are available to download in 3 different sizes. Maybe better than any site, these models almost always start out dressed in regular clothes. Similar sites do this too but a lot of them get by with the "panties and bra are fully clothed". If this helps put some perspective on it, I have a folder with 768 of their photo sets in it.
580 female models, so quite a few have more than 1 video or photo set. I used to think Sex Art was going to get my first-ever 100 score. I know the content is often vanilla to hardcore fans but they do everything they're supposed to do and surpass nearly all standards. I've not pulled the trigger on the 100 for a few reasons. The live girl ads. They're not really obtrusive but I've almost clicked them a dozen times. The videos that don't have any chemistry hurts some. It's just not quite there. And that's okay, too. I'm sure if they fixed those, I would find something else to complain about!
The last time I reviewed both Sex Art and X-Art, I felt Sex Art was a little better and I still feel that way. I see Sex Art as 5-6 points better than X-Art. Though, neither should take offense, I doubt any of the other "heartcore" sites would get an 80 from me. It's kind of strange to say this but if this was just a solo site, the score would be higher. They're going to tell me to try Met-Art X.
They have pulled away from the "series" style of films and I think that's a good move. They had ongoing series like "Girls Love Sex" and "Kamikaze Love" but I think it limited them.
They have a relationship with models that I've tried to think of a word to use to describe it but can't figure it out. As an example, maybe she's still very active but a set last week has Suzie Carina in it and I've not see her in nearly a decade. She still looks great, too. It's almost like they can get any model that's active. One of my favorites is Lorena B, she's a good example of how they have multiple videos/photos of one model. She has 34 photo sets and 15 videos on here.
While I'm happy with the navigation some might say it's too minimal. The scenes have tags on them and you can use those to find scenes with the same tags but there's no "category" search. So, if you like anal, you have to hope someone tagged a scene as anal. I did a search on the site to see if "anal" brings up anal scenes and I don't think it works. One of the results was a set named, "Analogies". That's where being a regular member works against a review. I join and can look back to see what I last downloaded and just start from there.
The models here, like other heartcore sites, are slender or athletic, not a lot of racial diversity but there is some and tattoos and implants are minimal. The picture sets here, like X-Art, are my favorite part. I like the Sex Art videos a little more. I join twice a year, actually moved my membership month up a bit this year since I've bumped off some sites from my regular rotation. I hope they continue doing variations in the fetishes (hose, panties, short-shorts) as I think it's a newer strength for their site. If you're used to the old Met-Art it can be fun being a member here since you get in the routine of the photo sets stopping at the fully nude parts but they go all the way here. A 96 might be as high as I can go on Sex Art and I would recommend it to those into clothing fetishes, solo models, pretty models, some of the models look too young models and of course for those who like heartcore style male/female porn |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
