Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Perv Mom

Perv Mom (0)

Newbie
90*
standard (0) 11-06-18  02:27am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Photo zips available
-Good video quality and production values
-Attractive MILFs
-Appropriately priced
Cons: -Not a huge site. Big enough to warrant the $10, though.
-“Stepmom” thing is a bit played out. Friend’s mom should play bigger role.
-Quite a few tattoos
Bottom Line: Pervmom is a very good site about stepmoms doing very bad things. It has high production values, gorgeous older women, and even some decent acting here and there. It’s mostly filmed in a POV style (the male talent probably has a camera mount on his head). It’s a similar POV approach as VR, but in 2D.

The majority of scenes are MF, but you’ll even find a rare lesbian scene or two. The one with Mindi Mink and a younger blonde is possibly worth the price of admission all by itself.

There are established names like India Summer and Ariella Ferrara and some less well known talent like Olivia Blu and Sofie Marie. Something that was a very pleasant surprise was seeing actresses that I haven’t seen in a long time and how they’d matured. Marie McCray comes to mind. I was never a huge fan of hers, but she has aged nicely and makes a great MILF. Vanessa Cage comes across similarly. She was always an attractive young woman, but her MILF stage is – for my money - probably her best.

Photo zips are available for each scene, but the ones I’d looked at appeared to just be still image grabs of the videos. The videos are high quality so that’s okay if you go in knowing what you’re getting, but it’s still comical at times because the image creation tool grabs a shot in between focusing and there will be a blurry grab every now and then.

Download managers are allowed and the videos are offered in different sizes. I’m showing 960x540 / 2800kbps for the smaller file sizes (250MB or so for ten minute clips) and 1920x1080 / 12000kbps for the HD version of the same, which comes in around 1GB. The HD is certainly clearer and the better option, but the non-HD is very high quality and would’ve been considered great looking quality-wise not even five or so years ago.

It’s a small site but priced accordingly. Price your services reasonably, get customers, put money back into site, grow, get more customers, put money back into site, grow, etc. I was impressed and I’ll likely join every year or so for the new content.

Bottom line: Recommended

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to standard!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.