Teen Dreams (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- 4K available for newer videos
- Tons of content, both photos and videos
- Download managers are allowed |
| Cons: |
- No way to mark favorite actresses that I could see
- Download files are often huge when considering the resolution
-That distinctly Russian style of recent videos |
| Bottom Line: |
Teendreams is a huge megasite with thousands of images and videos going back well over a decade. I saw what were clearly old photo sets that had 2009 as the “last appeared” date, but I’d be surprised if they were any newer than 2005 or so. I could be wrong, of course, but that’s just an eyeball guess.
And that access to older content is a very good thing. No, the quality of the older sets might not be achingly sharp, but they can’t be compared to modern photos and videos because of the limitations of the times. Just having access to the older content is a good thing, and the site is probably worth joining for nothing else other than seeing some favorite models in the earliest days of their careers.
Irina Bruni is a good example. I’m a big fan of hers and saw some early photo sets from 2010 or so that I’d never seen anywhere else. There are lots of other examples of this kind of discovery all through the site. I’d probably recommend it just on this element alone.
Download managers work, and the site doesn’t log you off constantly and require you to re-login. Good job webmasters. That’s the kind of thing that keeps paying customers coming back to give you more money.
The new videos are offered in resolutions up to huge 4K files if that's your thing.
The not-as-good:
It’s not uncommon to find an actress with two or three different sets under different names or in a different set including another actress’ name. It's more an inconvenience than anything, but you always get the feeling that you’re probably missing some content when you find sets of a favorite actress.
The distinctly Russian style of some newer videos is off-putting at times. You know the characteristics: The guys have mullets (often buzzcuts on sides), the women will have flat bangs and/or brightly colored plastic jewelry/socks/etc., and the scenes will seem washed out or overly beige.
The sets will download to your drive with no identifying elements whatsoever, so you’ll end up with a bunch of “10101_1242” style zip files or “49387_85844_1080” video file names. Again, not a huge deal, but a definite inconvenience and something that requires extra work if you want to organize scenes by a particular actress.
None of it is bad enough that I would discourage checking the site out if you have any interest.
Bottom line: Recommended, with a few reservations. I'd definitely re-join. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
