| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Loki (0)
|
mbaya, thanks for the review. I too noticed the new download limit at PJGirls. I'm not terribly thrilled with it, but don't find it restrictive at all because I never use a download manager. It's not a limit on how much content you can download, but rather on how many connections you can make to the PJGirls servers in an hour. If you rely on a download manager, you'll find it restrictive, but if not, you'll literally never notice.
PJGirls staff wrote a post to all members explaining the issue, and laid out that too many connections from users were overloading the servers. They implemented the policy of 100 downloads in a hour to balance server usage for everyone on the site. I give kudos to PJGirls for good communications.
I don't have a very fast internet connection, and have never experienced timing out on PJGirls. It has at times been slow, but since the implementation of the download limit, it has been less likely to be slow.
I find it unusual that their webmaster was suspended from PU. Can anyone clarify why this occurred? I'm not familiar for what offences you can be suspended. They were suspended, but the site is still listed. Is that a reasonable reason to criticize the site? You obviously think so, but I cannot say because of lack of information.
Thanks for the good review. We differ in regards to the site's quality and you make a good case for your point of view in your review. Good job.
|
03-03-19 06:15pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Loki (0)
|
I just spent a few minutes reviewing the webmaster rules for PU. I hadn't looked at them for the simple reason that I don't have any affiliation with any website.
It appears that there are two infractions meriting suspension, (1) that no incentives be given for reviews, and (2) any added text to a site must not ask or influence users to submit a review or comment with a specific agenda.
If PJGirls' webmaster violated either of these, they merit suspension, as without honest, impartial reviews PU is useless.
|
03-03-19 06:44pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Loki :
I don't know what to make of the suspension. I have never joined a site that had this happen before. It may be significant or it may not have anything to do with enjoyment of the site.
Thanks for the nice words, although I was a bit harder on the site than you were. I think it is a plus for PU to have differences of opinion.
|
03-03-19 07:47pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Loki (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - mbaya :
PJGirls is a one-trick pony. It focuses on very explicit gynecological views. I rated it based on how well it does on that basis. You come at the site with different criteria and explained your rating well. I liked your review a lot, and the differing criteria we use to judge the same site is what makes PU so valuable. You pointed out some really cogent points in your review that I hadn't thought about (like the camera angles), and I value seeing other opinions.
You wrote a good review. You might differ with me on how good PJGirls is, but that's what makes horse races, politics, and porn reviews. :)
|
03-03-19 08:32pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
WebmasterMartin (0)
Webmaster
|
Hello mbaya,
thank you for your review.
The account suspendation at PornUsers was a technical fault. PornUsers were acquired by TheBestPorn and as a result a lot of accounts were disabled and TBP aren't sure why because they are still looking into the code. So I wasn't a naughty boy :-) PU just had technical issues. In the end I had to create a new account and they assigned PJGirls to my new account.
Regarding the site name - we wanted to have a domain name that is easy to remember and "PJ" was free, that's the only reason. It sounds probably stupid but we couldn't think of anything smart in the beginnings and also our content was slightly different at that time.
Regarding content - we try to offer what's requested. Most people want gaping, some want toys, a minority wants speculum or gyno and occasional fisting is also very popular. So in the end people are always happy about a vast majority of our videos and unhappy about only a couple of them. It's impossible to please everybody but we feel we've found the right mix.
Regarding models - Czech models are by far the most popular girls in the porn business (even American model agencies often hire Czech girls and even pay for their flights etc.) so I don't see that as a disadvantage. If we wanted to have foreign models we'd have to grow first, it's not possible for such a small site (we're just two friends maintaining this site - webmaster Martin and cameraman Jiri) to pay for flights or hotels of models.
Regarding search engine - it works fine. If you select just videos with blonde models, you don't get just the most recent page, you can continue to other pages too and the blonde setting stays set.
Anyway, thank you for the review.
Regards
Martin, webmaster
www.PJGirls.com
|
09-19-19 02:23pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - WebmasterMartin :
Thank you Martin. I would like to do a rereview. Please keep in touch.
mbayarsky@msn.com
|
09-19-19 02:47pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
martinlongbow (0)
|
anyone knows if there is an anal version of this site? anal gaping instead of pussy? i know inthecrack but it is not exactly the same.
|
12-01-19 02:09am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #7 - martinlongbow :
ITC I think is the only one.
|
12-01-19 03:09am
Reply To Message
|
