Love Hairy (0)
|
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
- Low price for specialized interests
- High quality images of beautiful women
- Download managers work |
Cons: |
- Ads inside the paywall. Not so much ads, but camgirl stuff. Which are still ads.
Nitpicking:
- Overall size of the website?
- Not every single image set is enormous with amazing resolution? |
Bottom Line: |
Love Hairy is a sort of “best of” compilation site of Metart, Errotica, and other sites under the Metart umbrella that give collectors with specialized interests access to their particular flavor of beautiful women. And it’s great.
The site offers pages and pages of beautiful young women who are groomed but not shaven. I didn’t see any scary legs or bizarre hairy nipples. I only saw one or two models that would probably be considered “dyke”-ish. The majority of the models, and sets, are of women who just happen to look like actual grown women down there.
There aren’t many with underarm hair or stubble, but every so often you’ll happen upon one. Interestingly, the women are often so attractive that it’s not all that disturbing even if you don’t generally care for that sort of thing. Seriously, click through and find one and ask yourself if you’d shun her advances, refuse to sleep with her, or consider it a deal breaker in real life in any meaningful way.
Most sets offer multiple sizes of .zip files to download, with some of the more recent sets’ largest option being absolutely huge. There are occasional videos as well, but the photos are where the site really shines.
The online viewing of photos isn't my favorite, but I guess old-fashioned pages full of fast loading thumbnails you click to go to another page where the image can be viewed is, well, old-fashioned. Still, I would much rather have the option of choosing it over a site with thumbnails that you click and some sort of script puts the image in front of the open page of thumbnails until you close it. I know that's the direction everything has gone recently, but I don't care much about an "experience" when looking at nekkid pictures. The means of viewing them should be intuitive, fast, transparent, and un-annoying, and the modern flash/java/whatever approach often isn't.
My other gripe is the cam girl advertisements. They're at a point on the screen where you'll often drag your pointer across them and THEY'LL pop out to cover the content you actually want to see. A minor gripe but still one that should be mentioned.
Regardless, it's well worth the $8 if you have any interest in photos of beautiful women who don’t shave everything completely bald.
WEBMASTER:
May I suggest some similar sites for tanlines? How about freckles and redheads? I bet the tanlines one would be a decent draw, and I would suspect you have a thousand or more sets that would apply when you think that even the slightest bikini line would equal content. I’d definitely pay my $8 for it. Heck, I’d pay $10 for it. :) |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|