
This Girl Sucks (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Archive of 256 videos, 300 models
-nice ethnic mix of models, but mostly white teens
-Tag system for search
-Great selection of beautiful teens
-I have access to 28 sites in the Team Skeet network
-The members’ pages are secure (https)
-No broken links
-No download limits
-Nice discount through Pornusers |
Cons: |
-Prechecked cross sell on signup page
-Much advertising on the members pages, very cluttered
-Updates only once a month. Niche sites generally average once a week.
-The biller is Epoch |
Bottom Line: |
The Team Skeet network has gotten ratings of 90.5 from The Best Porn, 95 from Rabbits Reviews and on Pornusers Exotics gave it 80. I would be closer to Exotics score as the network has some flaws that I feel are worth deducting for.
This Girl Sucks has gotten ratings of 82.5 from The Best Porn, 79 from Rabbits Reviews and on Pornusers there has never been a review or a comment.
The site has been around since 2009 and the oldest videos are not available in HD. There is a large archive of around 256 videos, so there is quite a bit to be seen here despite that. Blow job sites are plentiful and the number of pornstars willing to do scenes like this is apparently limitless. You would expect at least one update a week, but it fails in that regard. Once a month is not impressive, and neither is much else about the site.
The models are nearly all white and young, with not much variation at all. It is hard to search the site to specifically check out the models as the network lists models, but the site itself is not searchable. I have seen many blow job sites and there is no excuse for so few that are older, of varying body types, or ethnicities.
The site sticks to the niche, offering videos that are only oral. I did not find vaginal or anal in even one scene. The scenes sometimes start with a short interview, but most start with the model nude and either in the act or about to. There is never any premise or story, but in all fairness that is true of most bj sites. There is much poor camerawork with crazy angles as well as shooting from too far away, or even ruined by poor lighting. I suspect there have been many directors whose work is here as there is no consistent style or format.
The pornstars are Americans. Some do a really hot scene, such as Vanessa Sky and Luna Bright. A few talk to you, but mostly these are very similar standard porn bj scenes. Many are shot in POV style, which I don’t care for. Mostly they are shot in hotel rooms and in some you see the male star using a camcorder.
I did not find any broken links and there is a photoset for every video. Downloads have no limit and were fast. The site was easy to use and it uses tags to search. I often found the models rather dull both as regards looks as well as in performance.This site could have done better.
If this were a standalone site I would give at most a 75 and that much primarily because of the sheer quantity of updates. As an addition to a pretty good network with a focus on young pretty models, this is worth joining. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|