Backroom Casting Couch (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- There's a backroom, a couch and girls wanting money or to become pornstar. What could go wrong?
- The girls are mostly attractive.
- Nearly 600 videos.
- Download speeds are good (80% of max)
- CCBill is the biller
- Some of the scenes feature good personalities.
- An update each week |
| Cons: |
- Well, as I enter my third month with this group of sites, they've decided to take a few sites away from me. I no longer have access to Net Video Girls or Casting Couch HD, thanks guys, there's you a 15 point deduction. No explanation needed. You don't remove access to sites you were previously including. You did and that's why I removed points.
- A lot of these scenes are dull. ExCoGi was much better.
- No pictures. Why does an amateur site not have pictures?
- It doesn't feel like they put as much into this site as ExCoGi and definitely not as much as Net Video Girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
I reviewed Exploited College Girls a few weeks ago and was very high on it and the package of sites included with it. One was Net Video Girls, one of my favorite amateur sites, now, without any kind of notice they removed Net Video Girls from the package of sites. They also removed Casting Couch HD from the package. I see they are now selling Net Video Girls with Casting Couch HD as a package.
I even made sure by trying to sign in to Net Video Girls with my credentials and it wouldn't sign in. I won't be reducing the Exploited College Girls school as I think it's a very unique and interesting site. This Backroom Casting Couch gets to start out with a -15 deduction. I don't want to go too far into the reasoning other than saying I chose to do business with these sites for 3 straight months, even allowing the membership to recur at $29.95 in the last two months of it. I could have just canceled it in month one and signed up with a promo with a different email address for month two. Their appreciation is to remove my access to the best site they have, Net Video Girls.
I'm really tired of having to write negative reviews because of terrible business practices. See, Backroom Casting Couch is not a bad site at all but now, I'm in a bad mood and feel like I can't trust them. It makes me see the faults.
My first pro says a lot. There's a couch in a backroom. The guy casts a willing amateur woman for porn. The enjoyable, entertaining style of Exploited College Girls isn't found here. The women look bored, not all but most of the recent ones, they roll around on the couch showing their 46 tattoos and it feels just as cheap as the recent women look. I'm going to be as fair as possible and say 1/2 of the women are okay. The other 1/2 should be paying me to watch them get naked.
The good looking ones are in the 8-9 range on an amateur scale.
There are no pictures. I try not to be too old-fashioned about porn but pictures of amateurs is one of the top reasons to join an amateur site. Would it really be that much to ask? I think anyone would agree the interview section of these scenes is not near as good as Exploited College Girls, another of their sites. Use that time to take 50-75 pictures. It has been a long time since I said this and maybe I should apologize before saying it. Some of these women look a lot better dressed.
If you think I'm being too harsh on the models go look for yourself. Of the last 15, Chanel is cute, Summer is cute with an even better personality, Leya and Jasmine are pretty, the other 11 are average or below. I think baseball is the only profession where 4 out of a 15 isn't terrible.
The video quality is very good with up to 1080p. The videos are long as I have explained before these long videos at a high resolution make for huge file sizes. One I downloaded earlier was 4.3 GB for the 1080p version. They also offer 720p and an unspecified resolution version that is smaller in file size. The ones I tested in the unspecified group were 768x432, so below 480p. Those can even be as big as 1 GB.
With no photos there is nothing to list about their quality.
I'm taking this directly from their site. This is one of transcribed conversations they list from one of the scenes:
Rick: I'm going to have you start by licking his ass.
Kim: What.. What??!! Are you serious?! Are you fuckin' serious?... ok, whatever..God... I don't wanna do that. I really have to do that?
Rick: That's what we do here. Welcome to porn.
We're back to way to go, guys. I think I would have edited out the part where she said she doesn't want to do that and asked again if she really has to. You walk a fine-line in this business. Holding money over someone's head to get them to do something they don't want to do isn't on the right side of that line.
I'm still not going to give it a terrible score. It has its good moments but I won't be back. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
