Tiny 4K (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ All good looking teen models
+ Fast server (almost always)
+ Video files @ MP4: 4K, 1080p, 720p, 480p and WMV 720
+ Screencaps to preview the videos
+ A Facebook-like emoticon system for rating the scenes
+ User comments with up and down voting on the comment
+ Zip files for pictures
+ PU discount (also available from the site itself at time of sign up)
+ Multi month and year subscriptions available (But see bottom line) |
| Cons: |
- Upsells EVERYWHERE
- Only updates 2 or 3 times a week
- Videos are all labeled file type and resolution e.g. mp4_2160 and wmv_720
- Picture zip files are all labeled Gallery
- Noticed that not all models are found in alphabetical search
- Smallish amount of content
- Pretty much formulaic content
- Random dropouts in download speed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Welcome to Upsell City! Go to login and you're greeted with an offer to upgrade to open all their sites for $69.95 a month. Click past that and you're on the site you signed up for, headed by a list of their sites with icons as a reminder that you've only opened one site. AND, of course, there's a button to, once again, direct you to upgrade to open all of the sites. Above the video is an offer to check out webcams. (Yeah - those are always free) Ignore all of that, click on a video and you see at the bottom of the page every scene that model has done for the other sites. I guess $70 is a good deal for access to 12 more sites, but you'd have to have a lot of time - and hard drive space - open to download enough to make it worth the money. I can certainly understand hyping your product, trying to draw in customers. What I don't like is paying for something and still getting the high pressure sales pitch. It's distracting, annoying and unnecessary.
Anyway... on to the content. With the advent of reasonably priced 10 and 12 terabyte drives, I don't shy away from huge files and only download the 4K video, so that's all I can comment on. The site is only 5 years old so all videos are available in 4K - a big plus. The files average around 5 or 6 gigs and, for the most part, look as clean as should be expected considering the file sizes. There are some camera shaking and focus issues here and there, but nothing too frequent to diminish the overall experience. Due to their updating only twice a week, there's just short of 300 videos in just over 5 years online at the time of this review. So, if you're like me, you'll figure that signing up for multi-month isn't really the smart option. This is my second time on the site and I think once a year with the PU discount is the smart choice.
If the girls weren't so good looking, the going-through-the-positions scenes would probably get old. To me, the girls are hot enough to overshadow the routines. There are some variances here and there... outdoor shoots... bathroom shoots, but most just wind up on a couch or a bed and going through the aforementioned positions, usually ending in a facial with a creampie or two (some obviously fake). I do like the fact that the focus is mostly on the model and not the stunt cock, with a good bit of POV angles in pretty much every scene.
The download speeds here are typically 12 m/s, a tad higher than just about every other site I've joined. But, for some reason, once in a while I'd get one creeping along at >750 kb/s. Cancel the download, wait a few minutes, restart it and it's back to full speed. That leads me to believe that it's not a hidden bandwidth limit as I first suspected.
I'm pretty anal when it comes to file organization, so having to rename every file wasn't too much of a bother. I'm used to having to remove underscores, change capitalization and the like, but mp4_4K for every video? Kind of ridiculous. I sometimes wonder if sites don't do stuff like that to reduce a member's time downloading to save bandwidth. Seems plausible, but who knows?
I'm not a picture person but to do this review, I checked out a few. They're clear enough, not overly repetitive, but at 1500 pixels on the long side, I'd say they're behind the times in the photo department. The photo sets don't seem to follow the associated video either. Picture people would probably be disappointed on this site..
All in all, not a bad site at all for teen aficionados. On an otherwise top notch site, I've scored it an 80, mostly on the strength of the available content, but marred by the somewhat smallish collection and the upsells that are in your face everywhere. If they'd do away with the pervasive upsells, go to more frequent updates (at least 5 a week?) and take the time to better label the files, this would be a damn near perfect site. As it is, I'll go back again some time in the future, but it'll be a while. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
