Lady Voyeurs (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill
-Videos are available in 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-Archive has 238 videos, large for a specialty site
-Has both a photo set as well as screen caps for each video
-Search uses a helpful tag system
-Many beautiful British porn stars with sexy accents
-Highly creative scenarios
-Part of six site network, 1346 scenes in total
-Uncluttered website with easy navigation
-Quick downloads without problems
-Frequent updates, about once a week. |
Cons: |
-Sometimes their accents are difficult to understand
-PU does not offer a discount |
Bottom Line: |
Thanks to KaytBuffs for her excellent review of this site. I would not have joined without your recommendation.
This site is certainly different. In a world where porn sites are often virtual clones with same old, same old sex this, is most definitely not your standard porn site.
The site itself is easy to navigate with no advertising or other distractions. The porn stars are mostly very beautiful and British, with some actual amateurs. Their accents are hot and sexy. The clothes and makeup are both very classy. The word Lady in the total is exactly what you see here.
As far as Voyeurs, the basic premise is that the women love to see naked men masturbate. Sometimes the women also are explicit, but mostly they just show panties and/or bras in an effort to turn on the men, who are portrayed as sex objects for the women who love to see them.
The best downloads are in excellent HD, 1920x1080 8000 kbps. The video archive presently has 149 approximately 15 minute videos, which are highly creative.
Some are interviews, where the women are asked when they saw their first penis and what they thought about that experience, if they check out men they see in their personal lives, what kinds of penises they like to see and how much do they want to see men masturbate. I know many women like to see men masturbate. I know of no other site with this theme.
Many scenes are highly creative and seem real enough, although of course they are staged. In most scenes the woman shows her man her bra and panties, encourages him to cum for her, but there never is any actual physical contact. It is all fantasy that requires a bit of imagination for the male viewer to get off.
There is hardly any interaction between the male and female in some scenes. Some of the women seem to be much more into it than others and I think that it hurts the site. I watched two scenes where the woman is nearly nude, flashing the masturbating guy, then the next woman just sits there and does very little. It makes those little interaction scenes seem like total wastes. Usually, it's the hottest women that aren't really into it.
At this point I would expect that you are wondering why my score Is not higher. The site sort of kind of works, but seems it is not as hot as most heterosexual males would like. I could see it as a site for women.
The focus is too much on the males. I see the fantasy aspect, but the screen is filled with the man masturbating. I don’t watch the men, I watch the women, who seem to be secondary to the action. For example, in one scene the female strips down and is masturbating to what she is seeing. Fine, this works for me. But, you can’t see much as there is a table in the way down there. Most of what you do get is a paunchy guy stroking his penis.
I really wish this site worked for me, but it does not live up to its potential. At least it is part of a network of six sites, which have a total video count of 1346. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|