Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit 60 Plus MILFs

60 Plus MILFs (0)

Newbie
90*
sergiop (0) 10-30-19  11:16am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: A lot of sites dedicated to gilf seem to hire whoever wants to work for them. That's not a bad thing, actually it's good to know that there's place for everybody. But that means also that a lot of hardcore sites dedicated to gilfs (Mature.nl, Lusty grandmas, Aged love, Grand mams) often are not exactly the best place to find super hot mature women.
On the other hand 60 plus milfs has the best looking models of this age in the industry. Cara Reid, Katia, Seka Black, Rita Daniels, Chery Leigh, Georgette Parks, Julia Butt, Gina Milano, Cammille Austin, Lady Sextasy, Leah L'amour and many others make this site hands down the best choice if one is into sexy older ladies.
A lot of great scenes (the ones with young men are without a doubt my favorites, check out the ones with Ivan, or those with Matt Sloan, Archie Stone, John Long or James), the interviews are fun, and the fact that they do anal scenes is really appreciated.
Cons: The recent lack of very young guys in recent times is my biggest complain. I've always thought that their main potential was in scenes where it's possible to see a hot woman like Rita Daniels fucking with a real nineteen or twenty year old guy like Archie or Ivan. Lately they're hiring often men in their thirties or even older, which is a big disappointment.
Also the bad camera work is frankly always been quite bad: no camera movement, lack of good angles (faces are the most erotic thing, and they seems to try to avoid the face of the male performer constantly, and sometimes even of the woman), too much close ups.
And the lenght of 20, 25 minutes for scene is just too short. I don't have anything against a good instroduction with teasing and dialogues, but with scenes that short this means lack of positions or positions seen for just few seconds and with very few angles. I think that scenes of 35-45 minutes could be much better.
Bottom Line: As said,if you're into hardcore sites with good looking sixty-something ladies this is the best one. And they do anal!
Sadly the full potential of the site is partially ruined by the fact that the scenes with young guys especially recently are very few, and the bad camera work and the fact that the scenes are too short are things to consider.
But in this particular niche this is the site I always eagerly look for the new updates.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to sergiop!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.