Femjoy (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a good collection of videos too.
Currently has 1,622 models
9,036 photo sets and 755 videos.
The videos are better than I expected them to be, while there's no full masturbation, there is light masturbation and full views of the models bodies.
Averages a photo update each day and a video update once per week. |
| Cons: |
Music in videos takes away the moaning -- if there is any moaning.
Site layout seems to have been changed. There is a button to go back to the old website style. The new or current style isn't real good to use with Edge Beta browser as the streaming player's function buttons are covered by the videographer's name and you click it when trying to fast forward, taking you to the videographer's page and stopping your video. |
| Bottom Line: |
I decided to review Joymii and Femjoy at the same time as I got the sites confused, having a Adult Time account makes it more confusing since both are on Adult Time now in very limited sample sizes. I joined both Femjoy and Joymii as standalone sites not with Adult Time access.
I'm not a big picture collector, but this is my second time on Femjoy and I really like their photos. Their biggest size is 6000x4000 or vice versa and they are incredibly crisp photos for that large resolution.
The models are your regular European teen models, you do see some variety in body shapes and sizes, but in general, these are slim or slender models and they are nearly all very pretty. The videos are better than most artsy sites and they do show full pussy spreads and buttholes. You even get some rubbing, light touching and that helps keep this site's content out of the too softcore grouping.
There is nothing close to a balance of videos and photos as the photos near 10,000 sets while the videos haven't even reached 1,000. All are downloadable and there's no limits from as far as I can tell.
It's a good site, I like it better than Joymii which I believe is probably ran by the same company and if not they are very similar. I prefer these solo scenes when on the softer side of porn.
The video options are 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p, 270p. Their content dates all the way back to 2005. There are some models here with tattoos, but they are minimal and don't distract.
I do think if you are interested in this site it should be more for the photos than videos, even though I recommend streaming a few of the videos. I think they could be seen as fetish videos with the pretty women naked, touching themselves lightly, their natural arousal and positioning causing their pussies to open, but then again, I could see just about anyone saying the videos are too softcore.
A few site layout issues aside, it's a very good site overall and should make any photo collector happy. The photo sets are often more explicit than the videos. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
