Naked News (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Can preview the entire site
-Updates six times per week
-Has links for discounts to porn sites
-Mostly gorgeous anchors |
| Cons: |
-Biller is Paysafe, not a well known biller
-Prechecked cross sale
-Username and password are random computer generated letters and numbers.
-Inadequate search capacity
-Not all videos are downloadable
-Most anchors do not have any photos.
-Non erotic stripping |
| Bottom Line: |
I find women newscasters to be very hot. Many times I have been distracted and think about them more than the news they cover. A dream come true would be how great it would be to see how they look under those clothes.
This site was started about twenty years ago and does just that.
The women here are mostly very attractive to drop dead gorgeous. Only a few don’t appeal to me very much, but that is just my taste. In more recent years some have the ugly trifecta of tattoos, metal hardware, or even worse, implants.
As a news site, it actually is pretty good. They cover the important news six days a week, as well as feature segments on a great many interesting popular topics, such as sports or entertainment. The coverage does not go into much depth and there is no real analysis. As much as this is reasonably well done, I did not join for the content. There are lots of sources for news that you don’t have to pay for.
As far as being a sexy fantasy site, this one comes up short in many ways. The old adage applies here that you should be careful what you wish for as you just may get it.
This site has most of the segments start and end with an already nude anchor. I appreciate nudity, but a teasing strip works better. The strip segments are the first ones each day and they call them “News off the Top.“
Unfortunately, on this site stripping is not much but mechanically taking clothes off and not done in a very sexy way. In fact often the model is nude under a dress and sometimes they strip from simple lingerie. Layers would work better, so they did not get the memo on that one. A little body movement would be hotter than a stiffly standing pose. Oh excuse me, I almost missed it, but sometimes they move their arms. There are almost no close ups and only rarely do you see her from the back as she walks away. What a shame. They rarely deliver a perfect fantasy wet dream.
There is also another problem that surprised me and I would not have predicted it.
The stripping is in the major news summary, so there is always a video playing on the left side of your screen and the model is on the right. I am completely distracted by this. I can’t get into the stripping, while on the other side of the screen a story is on about a natural disaster or worse yet, while our president is speaking. Occasionally the model goes off screen while the footage airs. I am sorry but I can’t get sexually excited while looking at Trump talking, or even Obama in older segments. No way, not ever, impossible, they must be joking. This requires a degree of focus I can’t imagine. They have been at this for twenty years and haven’t figured this out yet.
I think the solution is that stripping should be on the fluff segments that you don’t pay much attention to. The more I think about it, maybe they should just skip the serious news. If you are focusing on the news, this has failed as a sexy site.
The site also has some lesser faults. The videos start in HD in November 2013. Previous to that the videos are much lower in quality and many can’t be downloaded, not that you would really want to anyway.
The search capacity is weak. If you know the name of the anchor or the date of the broadcast, fine, it works for you. If you don’t know what you want, there should be tags. I guess they did not get the memo on this obvious move either.
At any one time, the number of newscasters is small. True they have guest anchors, but if you have seen a nude body standing and talking in 30 to 100 or even more consecutive updates, erotic fatigue sets in. The newscasters stay on the site for several months, even occasionally for years. Eila Adams has been on the news here since 2009 and Whitney St. John since 2006. After watching a few updates my focus drifted to the news content. This is especially true if she does not appeal to you.
There are 10 main anchors, 6 guest anchors and 59 former ones still listed in the model index. For the former anchors the link leads to a brief biography, but not to the videos. Few current or guest anchors have any photos at all. If they exist they are small and non nude glamour ones. The current and guest anchors listed are all white. In the past there used to be more diversity.
This site is different and maybe worth a one month join since the price is very modest. If you do try it out, don’t set your sights very high.
I give this a 75, but that high only because there are many models that are undeniably gorgeous. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
