Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Love Hairy

Love Hairy (0)

Newbie
78*
KayTBuffs (0) 12-08-19  08:47pm
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A site with 469 "hairy" models

More explicit than other sites in this genre, masturbation, girl/girl scenes and fully spread photos.

1,142 photo sets and 169 videos, all are downloadable.

Tagging system that can help you find models with similar traits as the one you're looking at, I even noticed a tag for "painted nails".

The majority of the hairiness on this site is in the pubic area. Some other hairy sites include hairy legs and hairy underarms, I haven't noticed any of those.
Cons: The site is newer, but some of the content is 19 years old. The layout is a modern layout, but those older photo sets feel like I'm looking at vintage porn.

While there are videos they are not that common and there's no set update schedule. They had 4 in October and November 2019, combined. Before that they only had 3 in the previous 9 months.

Small in quantity photo sets, some have as few as 20 photos in them.
Bottom Line: I find myself on the fence when it comes to hairy content. I think the biggest reason is too much pubic hair makes it hard to see the action (if there is any) that's going on in the pussy area. This site focuses more on women with hairy pubic areas than full, complete bushes. The content is mostly softcore, but there are usually 3-5 explicit photos in each set. The videos don't really feel like the belong on the site and I'm guessing they don't. Some of them credit Viv Thomas as the producer and look like content from 2006-2012. The videos are more explicit and even include lesbian scenes.

I like this site for including more explicit shots. I've joined several of these artsy sites over the last few months and I needed one to show me it was still pornography and not just women standing around naked. The explicit poses on here are even very good, done in what I would called "sexually provocative" ways.

I notice some big name models mixed in here that I think are now retired. The life of this site makes it seem like there should be more content. Maybe it was down or dormant for years?

The models are attractive and some are top-level in looks. I don't think "hairy fans" will think the content is hairy enough. A lot of these models have trimmed pubic areas.

The 1,142 photo sets can be downloaded as zips and will be the main focus of most members memberships. A better, more frequent and consistent video update schedule would help. It's a good, but not quite great site.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (6)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

tangub (0) The site has not been around for 19 years, I believe it's only been around 2 or 3 years. It's a collection of non exclusive content pulled from the sites within the Metart Network (ie Metart, Viv Thomas. Erotic Beauty etc).

Where you see the old dates on the content that will most likely be the dates they were originally posted on sites like Metart or Viv Thomas.

12-09-19  02:27am

Reply To Message

2

KayTBuffs (0) REPLY TO #1 - tangub :

I see it that some of the content in the member's area is 19 years old. That makes the site 19 years old to me. The snobbery and elitism here is disgusting.
12-09-19  05:27am

Reply To Message

3

tangub (0) REPLY TO #2 - KayTBuffs :

LOL....not trying to be a snob or elitist, just pointing out that it's a compilation site created by the guys at Metart 2 or 3 years ago where they took many of their hairy models photo sets and videos and created a new site for those people who are interested in just hairy models to find them all in one place.

I agree though that when you see 2001 dates on some of the photo sets it could give the impression of the site being 19 years old but that is most likely the original posting date on Metart.

There was me thinking I was being helpful offering some feedback on an error, I'll just shut up in future.

12-09-19  05:50am

Reply To Message

4

KayTBuffs (0) REPLY TO #3 - tangub :

Being helpful is one thing. You started it with a correction of something I can reword to say "content that dates back 19 years". That would have been helpful to suggest. Instead, you stick to the technicality that the site itself is only 2 years old. Do you think to a person considering the site they care more about some of the content being 19 years old or the site only being 2?

You then replied with a LOL like a 12 year old. That's really helpful and not mocking is it? I'll edit it and reword it to say the content on the site is as old as 19 years. And there is an elitism here. See pointing out a technicality that has nothing to do with the actual content. That's a need for correcting people.

12-09-19  06:39am

Reply To Message

5

tangub (0) REPLY TO #4 - KayTBuffs :

Personally I don't have a problem with 19 year old photo content and if I'm joining a site that has been around that long I like to know their entire collection is available to view online. I just think there's a big difference between a site that's been online 19 years producing their own exclusive content and a site that's just been around a couple of years and posting 19 year old non exclusive content from other sites.

A person considering this site the most important thing they need to know is that if they've joined other sites in the Metart Network previously then they're unlikely to find anything new or exclusive here.

Sorry you didn't approve of my original comment, maybe I could have worded it better.

12-09-19  09:58am

Reply To Message

6

Loki (0) Personally, I find the content of Love Hairy to be less explicit than that of We Are Hairy. But it's a personal opinion.

I liked your review. Thanks.

12-09-19  08:11pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.