Everything Butt (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Billing through Rocketpay
- Access to 34 sites in the Kink.com family plus partner "channels" where you get a taste of other sites content.
- STILL UPDATING (2-3/month is typical)
- Approx 500 videos as of December 26, 2019
- Amazing talent. Some of my favorites are Lauren Philips, Lexi Lore, Dee Williams, Britney Amber, Penny Pax, Christi Stevens, DANA DEARMOND (wow she really shines in her scenes)
- Lots of fisting.
- Some prolaps stuff (not my thing so I didn't go looking)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps - great production value. Sound and lighting are well done you can see and hear everything
- Allows download managers
- In general, older shoots have more plot newer stuff tends to do a little get to know you and then straight to action
- scene are typically between 30-45 minutes
- Most orgasams seem real
- scenes can be hearted for finding your favorites or remembering what you've already seen.
- Exclusive, as far as I can tell |
| Cons: |
PRO CONT:
- pre & post scene interviews
- Good organization: There's a star system (although I haven't figured out how to soert by rating). There's a very extensive tagging system, and a search bar that worked well in my testing.
- models giving good dirty talk (a huge plus for me)
- good model diversity (much better than most of porn). For this site mostly in terms of age. I'm a fan of MILFs and there's no shortage here
- Trailers so you can see what's good before downloading
- Each scene has a description and member comments - with so much content this really help find the things your more into
- Models can be favoited with emails when she does a new shot
CONS:
- Ads behind the pay wall (seems typical for most non-ameature sites these days 😞)
- No 4K videos yet. I'm fine with this since I haven't upgraded to a 4K monitor but I see it's where the industry is headed.
- Download file names are non-discript. This makes it harder to keep things organized |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS CONT:
- Expensive. If it wasn't part of such a huge network it would not be worth the price.
- While they do have good set-ups (not exactly "plots") I found the action tended to be rather forumaic following one of a few set patterns.
Bottom Line:
I'm not a big fan of all girl/girl action. But this site sure is an exception! The FemDom is believeable while still being playful. And the dirty talk and begging can be unbevliably good.
While it sometimes feel like things get repetative with the positioning. The introduction of new talent and new setups keeps this site from being boring.
It's a no-brainer to score kink sites in the 90s. They have the budget and practice to do everytihing right. What keeps this site from a higher score is the realitivly lower scene count. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
