FTV MILFs (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- One of my favorite sites, but have lowered score a few points since my last review of it.
- Follows a similar format and style as FTV Girls.
- Nearly impossible to find a flaw with any of the technical aspects.
- Excellent tagging system that carries over from FTV Girls and works even better here with less models than FTV Girls.
- 240 models currently, the site has slowly but surely started building up a good sized archive with a new model added each week.
- One I really like, models originally starting on FTV Girls years ago are starting to show up on FTV MILFs, 5-10 years after first appearing on FTV Girls. The most recent was Trinity St. Clair.
- A potential pro or con, there's a higher percentage of hardcore male/female sets on FTV MILFs than FTV Girls.
- Download speeds are very good (85% of my max) and the site runs smooth with multiple navigation positives. |
Cons: |
- One that might not go over well with those used to FTV Girls, more pornstars are showing up here than FTV Girls.
- Would like more updates as there are months with 2-3 pornstars being in updates, with only 4 updates per month, it lowers the percentage of new first time models.
- No longer a con for me but I know it is for some, the videos are split into actions/parts. |
Bottom Line: |
The FTV sites have been in my top 5 sites for the last 5 years. FTV Girls still is and I would go as far as saying it's my #1 site after nearly 4 years of constant memberships. I still see FTV MILFs as a top site, it's just not quite as good as FTV Girls.
I'm going to be straight to the point with the newer models part. Of the last 7 models, 4 have been pornstars and I know it must be hard to find MILFs that are First Time Experiences but this slight problem also includes more hardcore scenes. Some sites can pull off the switch between solo site to hardcore but with the established FTV style, hardcore just doesn't work for me.
One of the biggest strengths of FTV MILFs are the models that are first time models but they project a confidence of an older woman who maybe has always wanted to get naked on camera. I think most men in their 30s and up have met at least one woman like this in their life. You meet her and she seems nice and you notice she likes to wear skimpy clothes. The next thing you know, she's showing you upskirts and you're having trouble keeping up with her sexual drive that you know she didn't have when she was younger.
I think the pornstars take away from that strength. I think the hardcore scenes take away from that style. Even the hardcore scenes with women that haven't been on camera before. It's like adding the guy, usually her real-life boyfriend or husband, makes it less porn.
All that explanation for removing 2 points.
Everything else is good. For example, the two newest updates are first time experiences and they're two of the better scenes on the entire site. It takes a skilled pornstar to shoot this style and make it feel like a FTV set. I use her a lot when talking about FTV MILFs, Aaliyah Love, she is very capable of being a tried and true pornstar that can make you think she's a first time on video model.
The navigation is one of the parts that keeps me around. My favorite niche in porn, these days, is exhibitionism. It doesn't have to be fully explicit. It can be teasing an upskirt and it works with these older models. Concerns about lesser exhibitionism on the FTV sites are not as high as they were a year ago. Of the last 15 updates, 14 have some level of public nudity in them and that goes even further with 19 of the last 20 updates having public nudity. Take it one step further and closer to a year, 39 of the last 40 updates have public nudity in them.
It's FTV's bread and butter or wheelhouse. They do public nudity as well as anyone.
The video quality has included 4K since January 2018 and those 4K videos have 12,000 bitrates. I don't download those but they are there for those who want them. I download the SD versions. These are 480p and they are high enough quality 480p that they're good enough for me. You also have the option of downloading 1080p if 4K is more than you want and 480p isn't enough.
My once major con of the splitting of scenes is no longer a con for me. I would even call it a pro for me. A lot of these models are best at the public nudity parts. I download the one to two clips of their public nudity but don't download the indoors masturbation videos. It's becoming a matter of efficiency for me. The quality I download also has to do with the model. If she's a model I really like, I download 1080p and usually all of her clips, not just the public nudity ones. I think that's a nice versatility to have in what you're downloading.
There are 240 models and I'll say I don't find all of them attractive. The ages vary from 24 to 54, those are more rare as you'll find the late 20s to late 30s the most common age range.
The main navigation lets you select from basics like age or breast size or alphabetical or date of release. The tagging system lets you select from Hardcore, 1st Time, Public Nudity, Fetish, Busty, Real Orgasm(s), Dildo and so on.
I do think it takes a little time to get used to the navigation as their tags don't jump out at you. They are just colored and labeled icons that you click. They all work with what looks like 100% accuracy.
Most of the scenes for the models average an hour or more of videos and 4-5 different photo sets with each photo set featuring a different outfit and location. It makes the one update per week easier to accept.
And while I complained about the hardcore scenes there are only 21 or about 10% of their scenes. Maybe that's a complaint that's really a compliment? I like their regular solo content so much that those small amount of hardcore scenes are standing out much more than they should.
As with any FTV content the photography and camerawork on videos is as good as any site on the internet, maybe In the Crack could put an argument for the best but both are nearly perfect in their filming.
I look forward to seeing this site about 5-10 years from now. Hopefully, not much has changed by then. It's still the best MILF site despite my 2 point deduction. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|