Gloryhole.com (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- One of the oldest online porn niche sites (first scene was 2003).
- Classic scenario (gloryhole) brought into the internet age except the taboo is white women with black men.
- 651 scenes up to 1080p download (details on resolution in Bottom Line).
- Photos/screencaps available for download.
- Simplistic navigation but requires a lot of clicking.
- Epoch is the biller.
- Still updating every two weeks. |
| Cons: |
- The common con of heavy-niche content becoming repetitive applies here, though they and others have tried to add more to this niche.
- The dull scenes, this niche, maybe more than any in porn should bring out some kind of primal excitement from the female or fear but some of the models on here show no excitement or taboo stimulation.
- Not a con for me but if you want 4K you're going to have to pay $3.99 to $4.99 PER scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site and Blacks and Blondes were two very important sites in my online porn interests. There was an old TGP site that had 5-10 second clips of porn scenes (early 2000s) and Blacks on Blondes and Gloryhole were two of the sites often featured. They would put 2-4 of these 5-10 second clips up for download and you would then have to merge them or load them in a playlist to watch them in correct order.
I was only early 20s though I had been exposed to porn (VHS/DVD/Magazines) for years. Gloryhole was probably the first I had seen that had a niche or story to it. At the time, I was also an undergraduate student and remember the university I was attending at the time actually having "real" gloryhole "problems" in some of the less used buildings. Those real ones were more for gay men like the married professor who would go to one of the gloryhole restrooms to get or give a blowjob to or from a college guy. Keeping in mind, "gay" was not as mainstream back then as was taboo for a heterosexual married male with children to risk getting caught in a restroom with another male.
I later heard of couples that wanted to experience something different using it as a way to experience swinger life without going full swinger.
The scenes here follow a fairly repetitive format. The big difference between scenes is the female model. Some are there to collect a check. Some will masturbate a little before starting the blowjob through the wall. Some do a good job of making you feel like they're genuinely excited, others don't. It is the upside and downside of Gloryhole porn. There's not a lot of middle ground. The scenes either seem to be near perfect or barely watchable.
Someone did come up with the idea of adding sex through the gloryhole. This is also hit or miss. If the cameraperson is unable to get a good angle, all you see is the side of the woman bouncing back and forth into a wall. Other times the cameraperson gets a closeup and steady view of the penetration.
Considering how long this site has been around their collection is not that large with only 651 scenes in 17 years. That's less than an average of one new scene per week since its start. On the other hand, this is not a common niche. I remember once searching gloryhole scenes on a DVD site and finding maybe 8.
They have tried multiple variations of the blowjob through the hole in the wall from sex through the hole in the wall to multiple guys.
The ones I seem to like the best are the ones where the woman is giving a blowjob through the gloryhole while fingering herself.
There's not much to complain about with the site and quality unless you want 4K. These are exact numbers, the most recent 190 scenes have up to 1080p and also have the purchasable 4K upgrade for each of those 190 scenes. The 220 scenes before those had up to 720p. The other roughly 50% scenes are 480p and below.
I do think they could have done something to fix the disparity in quality. A mass remastering of all those 480p and below scenes up to 720p (minimum) would make the content on this site very collectible being a rare niche usually filmed in poor to average quality.
As it is, it's an above average site with what is becoming a repetitive niche just because of the limitations the wall presents. That shouldn't take away from its importance in porn history as a site that was taking major chances nearly 20 years ago. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
