Casting Couch X (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
- A girl, a couch and a guy trying her out to see if she's porn material.
- As good as other casting sites and as bad as other casting sites. The scenes are sometimes really good, other ones you're just going to skip after a few minutes.
- 297 scenes with 1 update per month.
- Decent blend of model types, all are in the 18-24 age range, but there are some Latina, some black models and nearly all are very attractive.
- I don't know hardly any of these models. I say it often, I am not up to date on newer models, except for the biggest stars. These might be mostly amateurs. They are to me.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max). No download limits.
- They do work some change into the scenes so every scene doesn't play out exactly the same like most casting sites do and I will go further on that in the BL.
- Excellent navigation. |
Cons: |
- The whole story to these scenes is these women want to be in porn.
- What I consider an amateur mistake in porn. The females spend a lot of time looking at the camera even during the sex, especially the ones that know they are pretty. I always found that distracting and even annoying.
- The good, the bad and the ugly comes out when they talk to the models before the sex parts. It probably could be called the, "Whether I'm going to like her or not." |
Bottom Line: |
Casting Couch X unlike other sites belonging to this group doesn't offer up to 4K on every scene. They do offer something I've not seen a lot on casting couch porn sites. They go pick the girl up which often leads to the driver either touching, fingering, or coercing the model to show him some skin while they're driving. That alone helps the site with me. You could put the worst porn scene in the history of porn in public and I would like it.
One thing I always look at when it comes to Casting sites is the length of the scene. This tells you if it's going to be a scene where the guy walks in and the sex starts or if they're going to talk some (which can be good or bad depending on the woman). Most of these scenes are at least 45 minutes so you're going to get long scenes.
There are downloadable photos but I didn't list them in pros or cons since they're kind of in the middle. The first 10-15 photos are just of the model. Which is good. I think these casting sites should have at least 50 photos of just the model. The rest of the photos are taken like screencaps of the action even though they have screencaps too. You're getting about 15 photos with each scene. There could be better focus on these photos, not focus as in camera lens but what they show. I'm still surprised by how few porn producers realize some people like seeing the woman dressed before seeing her naked. There's not enough of that in these photos to list them as a pro. I especially think when they're doing the parts in the car there should be more photos of that. Most will have 2-4 photos from the car part.
While you do get some diversity in the race of the models, most are slender to medium build.
This site differs from the other sites this company has in the upgrade package. The download formats are kind of peculiar, especially on the older scenes. The oldest scenes have an "Original WMV" version this is a 1080p version with the watermark down in the bottom right corner. They also have a 750 watermarked version. This is a 750x422 version that also has the same watermark. The WMV version doesn't say watermarked but is. They also have 1280 watermark version which is a 1080p version that has, in my opinion, outrageous bitrates at over 14,000, making the files over 5 GB each.
There's a little inconsistency too. The newest videos have some without a 4K option. While others have 4K. Most of the videos have 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. But I still don't understand the oldest ones listing a 1080p video as 1280.
This doesn't take away from the site. It just makes you be careful about what you download since a lot of those older videos are massive in file size. I have always heard a good bitrate for 1080p is 8,000, the only way it should be up there in the 14,000 range is if it's more than 30 frames per second, these are 30 frames per second so nearly double the bitrate that is needed.
There are a total of 294 models and there are scenes with two girls in them.
I would definitely recommend it for those that like casting couch scenes. I wish I knew if these models are amateurs. There's one named Anissa that looks quite a bit like Anissa Kate and looks like if it is the well-known porn star it was early in her career. They don't list any last names which would help a lot. The scenes are enjoyable unless the woman is annoying (about 10% of the scenes). One of the better casting couch sites I've been on as long as you don't let those older videos strange listings throw you off. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|