Beauty Angels (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Young, solo girl and lesbian scenes.
515 scenes with 3 to 4 scenes added each month.
Porn User's price of $14.95 is very good.
Downloadable videos and photo sets with each scene.
The newer videos have 4K.
Good use of settings including the bathroom and shower. |
| Cons: |
The not that much older scenes (2013) only have up to 720p.
Very little story or dialogue. |
| Bottom Line: |
The title of this site could be subjectively questioned. I didn’t list it as a con, but there are some models on this site I don’t even find attractive. My main interest in solo girl porn or lesbian isn’t in the model’s looks. I still don’t consider myself bisexual or lesbian. I do like watching younger women masturbate and play around with each other in lesbian scenes. I didn’t list the looks part in cons since their looks are not part of my interest in this type of content.
I was surprised to see the videos as new as 2013 only had up to 720p in the download options. The newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K. The big mistake I likely make with sites like this one is I forget they don’t speak English -- or Hindi. I don’t require a story, but I do like to know what they are saying.
This is a normal solo and lesbian site. The lesbian scenes are believable enough. You can see the tongue touching the clitoris. The solo scenes feature believable orgasms including pussy lip spreading to show contractions. It’s hard to pick whether the solo or lesbian scenes are better or worse when comparing the two. The lesbian scenes do seem to get a little kinkier. One part I have noticed is the newer solo scenes are more dependent on toys instead of fingers. The older scenes have more fingering in them.
You have 515 scenes with video and photo sets. The update schedule is okay with 3, sometimes 4 new updates per month. The discounted price here on Porn Users helps a lot too.
My favorite setting for solo and even lesbian scenes is the bathroom or shower. They have a good selection of scenes from those locations. I think it’s just the belief these girls look so young they would be using the bathroom for their masturbation. I didn’t list this as a con, but could have. The camerawork could be better. I have watched several scenes where the model is orgasming in solo, but the camera is pulled back. I don’t want close-ups, but I would like to see a closer view on the orgasms.
It’s a good site for what it is, but I have seen better. That could be the language barrier. Some of the models are very quiet and barely look or sound like they are enjoying themselves. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
