Anilos (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- The older women take over Nubiles.
- High production values and has a classy side to it.
- Very good download speeds (85% of max)
- Epoch is the biller.
- A total of 672 models with all having more than one video and more than one photoset.
- Nearly 3,000 scenes, some of the videos don’t have an accompanying photoset.
- 11 updates in the last 7 days. They have been averaging more than 1 update per day. |
| Cons: |
- It has been a con on this site for a long time, the definition of what makes a woman a “mature” model. There are models in their 20’s on the site. That’s not a con for me as those mid to late 20’s into their 30’s models are my favorites.
- I have said this about every site this company runs, the scenes can be very boring and dull, generic, bland. |
| Bottom Line: |
At one time, I considered this site a mid to high 90’s but similar to their younger models site, Nubiles.net, it has lost some of its appeal. I don’t know how much has changed in terms of management of this company’s sites but something changed. It wasn’t for the best.
The main type of porn you will find here is solo. It’s nice seeing solo models that aren’t “barely legal” or not old enough to legally drink alcohol. It has been my belief for a long time thanks mainly to FTV MILFs, that the models over 30 are more confident, comfortable and make better solo videos. It’s a genre I was spoiled on. With models like Eve Angel and Sophie Moone, that could control and capture the viewer’s eyes with their eyes.
Which is why I lowered the score on this site. I don’t get that from their newer content. I’m going to share an opinion that may not be the right one to share. Of their 20 most recent models, I found 2 of them attractive. We’re running into something that we used to wonder about. What will tattooed women look like when they get older? It’s something I’m not apologizing about since I pay to look at women I find attractive. They just aren’t bringing the attractive ones in like they used to. The two I like from the past 20 are Anastasia Ocean and Frida Sante. I’m not familiar with either but they are 30 and 34 respectively. One of the most unusual for me is a recent model named Ella Brown, not only is she not attractive to me she’s only 20. Maybe Covid has hurt their workflow or ability to find models?
There’s nothing to complain about with the site itself. They update as often as anyone currently. They have 270p to 1080p downloads on their videos. Their picture sets are large, professional and are often better than the videos. I’ve said it before, you can have all the technical parts right but if the models aren’t attractive to the viewer nothing else really matters.
The site is huge though with nearly 3,000 videos and 2,000 photosets. The older content and models were much better at least for me and that’s what tempers my lowering of the score. It has good scenes on it. I just haven’t seen many good ones in the newer ones. If you have been a member lately, you might want to take a tour and look over the newest updates before joining. I know we’re all different and respect that. If you’re into slightly older women than most porn has these days it’s probably worth your time to check this site out. I’ll end with the part about the ages. The models here range from 20 to 50’s. I rarely find any of the 40+ year old models that attractive and feel like that’s why I don’t like the newer content as well. A lot of these newer models are older, it’s not unusual to see overweight and large, saggy boobs. One of the newer models is 46 with natural 36H boobs. She has a pretty face but the overall look doesn’t do anything for me. It’s still a good site with my pickiness being the only legitimate complaint. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
