Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy (0)

Newbie
90*
rearadmiral (0) 01-22-21  07:05am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - An opportunity to explore a rarity in porn, naturally hairy women.
- Very large site
- Great production values
- Many amateurs (which can be a negative too)
- Broad range of models – age, ethnicity, body type
- Solos/ girl/girl and boy/girl scenes
- Rare niche
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Many download options
- Two video and two photo set updates per day
- The site is well laid out and easy to use
- Great for photo collectors too
Cons: - No 4K option, for those who prefer that
- Very few known pornstars, mostly amateurs (this is subjective)
- Yes this is strange for me to say, but some of the women have too much body hair
- No TBP/PU discount
- Expensive
- Stand-alone site – no bonus sites
Bottom Line: Full disclosure – this membership was a real stretch for me. I prefer models who have an intimate relationship with their razor but recently I’ve been pushing my own boundaries.

Obviously, based on the name of the site alone, it’s primary niche is unshaved women. I think a better description is that the women here are natural. The level of hairiness ranges from a thin layer to a curly mound that spreads down the thighs. Also, the hairiness doesn’t have to stop with the pubic area – we’re treated to other ‘natural’ areas on the female body too. You’ll find some hairy ‘pits and legs here too.

The site primarily offers solo scenes, some with masturbation and some with just posing. It isn’t hard to find lesbian and boy/girl sex scenes either.

I think it’s fair to say that the site can also be seen as an amateur site. A vast majority of the models are amateurs though I will confess that I have limited experience in this niche so some of them may appear on other sites too. But, it’s fair to say that you’re not apt to see your favourite A-list models here.

The scenes themselves aren’t scripted and usually follow a flow from clothed to nude. Some of the scenes end at teasing and posing while other go on to masturbation with fingers, toys and household objects. I like that most of the models aren’t heavily made up and wearing ‘porn clothes.’ Most start in clothes that you’d expect any woman to have. The ‘sets’ are usually just in someone’s home.

One other thing that the site does well is that the orgasms seem genuine. I’m not naïve; I think that in most hardcore scenes the woman’s orgasm is faked. Here, I don’t think they are.

One thing that I noted and really liked is that regardless of age or body type, the models here were genuinely into their scenes. It appears that these are ‘regular’ women who are really turned on by offering themselves to be seen as a sex object. That alone held a lot of allure for me. All women are sexy!

The site also offers something akin to BTS scenes as on other sites. Here, they are conducted as interviews. I’m a fan of BTS stuff and I liked the interviews here too. I liked hearing these women talk about themselves. For me, it made the scenes more intimate.

Speaking of the models here, and this is likely the case on most amateur sites, there is a much broader range of model than you’d find on a more mainstream site. Here you’ll find a range of ages, ethnicities and body types. I say this in other reviews but it really is applicable here: there is something here for everyone – with the proviso, of course, that this is a site that features women with natural body hair.

The site is large – huge even. There are currently around 7600 videos available and two more are added each day. It’s hard to argue against the value of the site with numbers like this.

The scenes are downloadable in three resolutions, 1080p, 480p and 360p. Bitrates on the 1080p are 6000 kb/s and are 30 fps. My preference would be to bridge the gap with 720p but that’s subjective. Also, most of the scenes are around 15 minutes long so the file sizes aren’t really an issue anyway. Some may wish for a 4K option, but I think that given that these are mostly amateur models it’s probably too much to hope that they or the director would have a 4K camera available.

The site is a rarity in that it offers as much value for photo collectors as it does for those who collect videos. There are currently 9100 photo sets with two more being added daily. The photo sets are downloadable as zips and the site even offers a feature that allows the user to customize the photo set. I’m not a photo guy so I confess that I didn’t use this feature and can’t really comment on how well it works. Three resolutions are available: 1024, 1600 and 3000 pixels.

The site itself is logical and easy to use. It relies on tags to assist in sorting the scenes, which is essential in a site this size. Some of the tags are unique to this niche – you can even choose to sort by the level of ‘hairiness.’ Given the range of scenes here, I think the site would do a service by added the ability to sort for stripping versus masturbation and others like that.

I found download speeds to be the same as I’d find on other mainstream sites. I had no issues with downloads and didn’t encounter any limits.

The cost of the membership is relatively high and there is no TBP/PU discount offered. But, given the size of the site and it being a rare niche I think it still offers good value for the money.

The bottom line is that while this isn’t my kind of porn, it’s well done for people who are into this niche. The site is easy to use and offers a lot for the money. If you like this niche you really should check out We Are Hairy. I don’t have much experience in this niche but it’s hard to think that there could be any better out there.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Loki (0) Good review rearadmiral, but one thing I'd like to note is that you say there are a wide range of model types. The majority of the models are Russian, with most others being Europeans and a fair number of latinas. There is a dearth of ebony models on the site.

Still WAH is in my opinion the premier hairy site on the internet.

01-22-21  11:14am

Reply To Message

2

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #1 - Loki :

Thanks for commenting!

I agree that Black models are relatively rare on the site. They are there but I may have overstated it.

Thanks for saying that WAH is the premier hairy site on the 'net because while it looks like a great site to me I don't have a lot of reference as it isn't a niche I normally like. This will be useful to people reading this who may be contemplating a subscription.

01-26-21  05:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.