Suburban Amateurs (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Choice of CCBill or Epoch for payment processing.
Site online since 2003.
Good sized collection; 311 Models, 2468 photo sets (333,367 photos) & 759 movies.
Photo sets since 2011 come with downloadable zips in 3 different sizes; small 1280 px, medium 2000 px and large at least 3000 px. Between 2009 and 2011 the 2000 px is the largest on offer.
Newer videos (2011 onwards I think) fairly decent quality 1280 x 720 with 5k bitrate.
No background music in videos.
A paradise for stocking lovers.
Good download speeds.
No problem using my D/L manager (DTA)
Good file naming for zips (model name plus set number), videos only the newer ones have unique file names including the model name.
Advanced search engine covering dozens of categories although I'm not convinced it's always accurate.
Rate models and add to favourites. |
| Cons: |
Since 2017 the site is barely updating. 1 update in the whole of 2018, 2 in 2019, 4 in 2020 and 1 during my membership in January 2021.
The dates have been removed from the tour pages so you can't really tell if it's updating before signing up.
The bonus site Suburban Sluts adds little value as mostly low resolution pre 2004 content.
Pre 2009 photo sets max at 1024 px.
Older videos poor quality at 720 x 576 with 1k bitrate.
If you're not in to solo content not much else to see.
Too few outdoor sets.
Can become a bit repetitive.
No PU Discount. |
| Bottom Line: |
Suburban Amateurs is one of those sites that has been around for years and has always been kind of semi on my radar but since they used to charge a ridiculous $35 there always seemed to be something cheaper and better on offer so never got around to joining. Lately I noticed the price is now down to $24.95 and in addition there's something strange going on with CCBill's regional pricing from the UK when I change the price to GBP currency the price comes down to the equivalent of $19 so I signed up as it's the cheapest I've ever seen this site.
The site started out back in 2003 with the premise that these are British amateur models in solo striptease and masturbation photos and videos. Whilst it's true that you may find some genuine amateurs unique to this site particularly in the early years, over time they gradually started using more professional models. You can find many well known British and Czech models who have appeared on dozens of sites, names such as Abigail Toyne, Carla Cox, Cate Harrington, Charlie (a.k.a. Kloe Kane), Danielle Maye, Kacie James, Kayla Louise, Michelle Moist, Natalia Forrest & Sandra Sanchez to name a few. There are also some interesting finds of some models early in their career. The model named Kirsty H here is actually Sophie Dee before she had those horrible big fake tits and there's also a cute , petite, small breasted Asian girl named Koko Li who later morphed in to Tigerr Benson on DDF Busty with a massive pair of fake tits.
The vast majority of models are young and hot, aged from 18 to 20 something with only a handful of older ladies in their 30s and 40s. Whilst you might find the odd pair of fake tits here and there the vast majority look natural with a good variety of body types from slim to curvy. There's little ethnic diversity here, out of 311 models I only counted 7 or 8 with Black/Asian/Indian heritage. Make up and styling is minimal so in general they have that cute girl next door look. The content is about 98% solo striptease and masturbation with just a small number of lez, BJ, and B/G fuck scenes/picture sets.
The site enjoyed rapid growth in the early years updating 6 or 7 days a week from 2003 through to 2010 before tailing off to 5 days a week in 2010 then gradually down to 3, then 2 then 1 a week from 2014 to 2017 when it stopped updating regularly with only a handful of updates since then. So by the time the resolutions of the photos and videos improved in 2011 the site was already going into decline. The result of this is that around two thirds of the overall photo sets have a maximum resolution of 1024px.
Despite the amateur theme of the site the photography is for the most part of a good professional standard. There are a few amateurish sets though that look like they were shot by somebody different from the main photographer. As a lover of striptease content these photo sets really hit the mark for me with lots of sexy outfits, uniforms and especially stockings and heels. You often get 50 or more photos of tease before the clothes come off. Sets generally contain 120 to 160 photos. In many ways this site reminds me of Only Tease but with the added pay off of full nudity with masturbation and toy use. My only complaint would be the lack of variety in shoot locations. The majority of shoots take place in what I assume is the photographers house so you're constantly seeing the girls photographed in the same bedroom, same bathroom, same kitchen, same stairway etc. It would have been nice to see more outdoors sets.
If you like to hear girls talking dirty to you in a British accent as they tease you and strip out of their clothes before masturbating then the videos here might hit the mark for you. I enjoyed them to a point but after watching a few it started to get old rather quickly but then I'm more of a pictures guy. Average run time of the videos is around 15 minutes. One minor annoyance is that when you click on a video it starts playing automatically in your browser.
The navigation is simple and functional. You have the usual options of photos, videos and models with the option to sort them by most recent, most popular and name/title. There's also an A-Z model listing where you can click on the letter on the alphabet. Model info is limited to age, star sign and home town.
You get access to a bonus site called Suburban Sluts with 723 photo sets and 144 movies. I had a brief look around but I didn't find any photos bigger than 528 x 792 px or videos bigger than 352 x 288 so I didn't save anything.
Overall I really enjoyed the models and sexy teasing photo sets here but the glory days for this site were clearly 10 years or more ago so realistically can't score it more than a 79 today and that's probably being generous. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
