Met Art X (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It is similar to Met Art except with more explicit videos and less of everything else.
308 models and 307.5 of them are 8 or higher on a 10 scale. Very pretty women.
They have 1,025 videos and 838 photo sets.
They update daily with either a video or photo set.
Everything is downloadable and without limits as far as I can tell.
Could possibly subscribe to the theory of less is more when compared to regular Met Art. |
| Cons: |
Other reviewers have mentioned this con on various sites on the Met Art Network, those Staff Selection scenes are kind of annoying. There also are ads on the right margin of your screen.
If Met Art’s explicitness is a 3-4 on a 10 scale, Met Art X’s explicitness is a 6-7, I would like to see them up it a little more in the 8-10 range since this is still solo porn and not hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
There are alternating feelings with this site. I also joined Met Art’s regular site. I was completely and utterly overwhelmed by Met Art’s regular site. It would take me a year just to see all their models. Met Art X has a much more manageable 308 models to sort through and it’s more explicit -- just not as explicit as it probably should be.
I was surprised by the lower amount of photo sets than videos since Met Art is known best for photos. The feeling I get from this site is that it's what would happen if Met Art regular let their shoots run an extra 15-20 minutes. You still get the tease, you still get the strip (most scenes) and instead of stopping at showing off their pink, you get to watch them use it on Met Art X.
The site is relatively large and the quality is very high. The photo sets and videos combine for nearly 2,000 potential downloads and I have not read or seen anything about limits on the downloads. They are updating daily which is a rarity these days and they seem to have updates prepared for the future. You can check to see what the next updates are going to be. Which is good for the consumer and for the site too. It could help you decide to keep the membership for another month or decide to cancel.
My biggest con and complaint is the masturbation is on the more gentle side. As a member of 5 of Met Art’s sites right now it almost seems like I’m going through a progression with each site. With me, watching young women masturbate can be very arousing or very boring. There doesn’t seem to be a middle ground. Some of these scenes go into very arousing and the rest are very boring. When I reviewed Nubiles (my once favorite site), I talked about how the most realistic masturbation can be the least interesting to watch. I don’t get that feeling as much on Met Art X, but it is there. What does most realistic masturbation mean? That the model is trying to get off as fast as possible. If she does it in a sexy way that’s good, if she doesn’t, she doesn’t care since she still got off and got paid doing it. The first solo models I remember watching around 2008-2010 did that too, but there were some of those who seemed to be as much into being sexy, being seductive and alluring the viewer into watching her masturbate. Which does give the viewer the feeling they want you to join them. It seems to be the magic ticket with solo porn.
That is a personal complaint and doesn’t really reflect negative feelings towards the site. The site for my money more than delivers on giving you the content you paid for. There are 4K, 1080p, 720p, and smaller download resolutions on the videos. The photo sets can be downloaded in 3 different sizes and are of the same quality you would expect from a Met Art site. I just wish the content was a little harder even as solo content. From the content I have looked through there are no other genres explored than solo. If there’s a lesbian scene in there I must have missed it. Doing a search on the site for “lesbian” brings up 4 scenes, but all 4 are solo. Maybe they are saying the model is a lesbian in real life? There is no male/female.
It’s still a good site as long as you know what you are getting into. In my limited experience with porn it is not that common for me to see a site that is strictly solo. The women, the technical quality and ease of use of the site all help the site greatly. The tags are helpful, but I do think they could find another way to list those. There is no menu for tags. You just see the tags once inside a scene and have to hope one of the tags is one you’re looking for. The search box does let you search, but there is that inaccuracy with the lesbian search. These are ticky-tacky problems to what is to me a better way to introduce yourself to the world of Met Art since it’s not overwhelming. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
