Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV MILFs

FTV MILFs (0)

Newbie
92*
Alybator (0) 04-11-21  10:55pm
Rookie Badge  Female Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A different take on the Milf niche than I am used to and I like it.

Nearly 350 models with some being completely new amateurs and some being established porn stars.

Impressive variety of models (age, body types, what they are willing to do)

Each model has at least one video series that totals 80-120 minutes and 200-500 photos. They add a new model or returning model once per week.

Site navigation is confusing at first, but gets easier to use and understand. The navigation then becomes a pro for the site.

Uses reputable billers, it gave me the choice of CCBill or Epoch. I prefer Epoch and chose it.

Very professional feeling with just enough amateur touch and the added variety to keep it from being samey from model to model.
Cons: Downloading the videos was a big problem for me during my first week of membership, but I then figured it out. This site and their other site FTV Girls handles downloading videos differently than any site I have been a member of.

The porn star scenes are not as enjoyable to me.

If you plan to download the 4K versions of the newer videos you better have a very fast download speed.

Filenames could be better.
Bottom Line: I have been interested in joining this site and their other site FTV Girls for awhile now, but I keep forgetting about them. The scenes are to me similar to if you met a model, talked to her, helped her find and explore her fetishes while videoing her and taking very pretty pictures of her. There’s a personal side to each scene you don’t get on most porn sites.


My thoughts on the different models can be explained without too much trouble. They do defy the laws of what is a MILF. Some of these models are in their 20s. I know it has been a discussion here before. While MILF could be even an 18 year old -- in porn, MILF content does seem to be more in the 30 to 50 year old models. There is also the possibility of some of the models looking a lot younger than they are. You will see that with several on this site.

The scenes like to bring in some forms of exhibitionism in the beginning. I have read that it has been tamed down over the years, but to me any form of exhibitionism is a big deal. If it’s a flash, if it’s masturbation, and it’s in public that is a big deal. Like most women and some guys, I enjoy exhibitionism. There are sections in the videos where the cameraman talks to the model and it’s not the same redundant questions you usually get in porn.

The videos, I noticed a complaint posted on the FTV Girls videos recently, but I don’t know the technical terms. I think the videos look great, they have pretty scenery when outdoors and the indoor parts are clear with plenty of close-ups. I kind of was expecting more softcore. I was correlating softcore with exhibitionism, but these scenes all have masturbation that is as graphic and even extreme as I have seen. There’s nothing disgusting or ripping the woman open with a massive dildo, but I am seeing more real orgasms on this site than on most sites. The pictures are similar to the videos in terms of pretty scenery, colors and vibrance.

You can download the videos and photo sets. The problem I had with downloading the videos in case anyone else runs into this. When you click on a scene it opens the video and there is the download link for the video. I was not realizing each video has multiple parts. I was just downloading the 1st video. Which also led to me thinking this is a very softcore site. I could see how that would bother some people. The file names could be better to work with having to download multiple videos to piece together a full scene. I did read over the more experienced reviews of this site and FTV Girls and now can see what has been said. There is clearly a separation in the scenes into parts so you can just download the parts of the video you want to see. If you don’t like the interviewing/talking part, you can skip downloading that. If you don’t like masturbation, you can skip it. If you don’t like exhibitionism you can skip that part. The reason I can see this being useful is from my cons. The 4K videos from this site are very large. The most current update has 14 parts to the video. If you downloaded all 14 parts in 4K the scene would be around 15GB total. That’s just too much for me for one full video and being able to choose which parts you want to download gives you the chance to pare that size down.

One of the parts I am most impressed with is the model variety. These look like almost all American models and they come in different sizes (most are average or slimmer), some with large boobs, others with smaller boobs, blondes, brunettes, redheads, black women, Indian woman, Latinas and the ages look to go from 25 to around 50.

They are updating once a week and the update is bigger than a usual update since it includes 80-120 minutes of video and 250-500 photos of the model being featured that week. There are a few lesbian scenes and a few male with female scenes, but I didn’t even watch those since I take this site -- as said, as a personal experience of getting to know the one model.

I am very impressed overall and will be a returning customer to this site and FTV Girls too.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (0) Excellent review! Coincidentally, I was starting to write a review of this site as well but that doesn't make sense since you've covered everything and your comments are very close to what I was writing.

I agree that the whole "MILF" thing here is stretched a bit. My preference is for younger models so while I have been a FTV Girls fan and regular subscriber for a long time this was my first time joining FTV MILFS. What drew me in was that many of these supposed MILFs are in their 20s and very beautiful. I'm glad I joined.

Like you, the fact that the videos are broken down into clips has caused me problems too. I'd guess that the first few times I joined and rejoined FTV Girls it took me a while to discover/remember that these were in clips. It is confusing though I suspect the FTV sites have a lot of recurring subscribers so this isn't an issue for them.

There has been a third FTV site that's been teased over the past several years. It's called FTVX. Apparently Rob, the site owner, has some hardcore scenes with some of the models and he had been teasing a full site for these but nothing has ever come of it. That seems odd to me as it could be very lucrative for him.

04-12-21  06:03am

Reply To Message

2

Alybator (0) REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

Sorry about review-blocking (is that like cock-blocking?) you! I joined the FTV sites on a 3 month combo promo and am running out of time on them.

I still am having problems with the video downloads. I think it's because of the filenames.

I believe we talked once before about tattooed models always end up in these brutal hardcore scenes and I see Milfs in a similar way. Every site that has Milfs it's either having sex with her daughter's boyfriend or these outlandish storylines that are kind of degrading. That is one part I really liked about FTV Milfs, even the older women on it. It shows them being just as horny and taking care of themselves just like we usually see teens and 20s models doing. I do like the FTV Girls site better, but it has weighed me down on the review since I was brand new to it and there's so much content on it.

I would be interested in a FTVX site. I like the way they film and produce their scenes. I don't know if adding a male would make it harder to be as flexible with their scenes or not, but I would check it out. I am planning on renewing the 3 months to just FTV Girls once this combo membership runs out.

04-14-21  07:08am

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #2 - Alybator :

Don't worry about it! My review would have just re-stated what you said.

The porn niche of MILF is odd. First, there seems to be a stock definition of someone who has large breasts, real or fake. I like that FTV has a broader definition. Frankly, I'm not really a fan of the whole MILF designation. Who cares? If a beautiful woman wants to do porn I don't care what her age is. I tend to lean to younger models primarily because many of those have the smaller breasts / petite body that I like. But there are so-called MILFs that I still love too. Remember Tara Ashley? She had a short career and started in her early 30s. She even was cast in some teen-themed stuff. Models like Dani Jensen and Marie McCray will always cause me to hit the download button, regardless of their age.

Besides, just because a model is 20 doesn't mean she has to be petite. Gabbie Carter is a big deal these days and while I see the star quality in her, her body type isn't what I usually watch.

Porn classifications are strange and we can't change them.

FTVX has been teased for so long that it's probably just a unicorn now. There are a few hardcore scenes at FTV Girls. Those started as teasers for the new site which was promised to be coming soon. That was maybe five years ago. The really strange thing is that the guy who owns the site could make a ton of money by going ahead with it. But then again, he's probably in the 1% just on FTV Girls alone.

One thing I do miss is the more risque public shoots at FTV Girls. They still exist but are more guarded now. The site owner wound up in legal trouble for one particular scene. Unfortunately that scene is no longer available.

I might regret writing this and drawing the ire of some, but it's odd that it's completely illegal for a couple of models to flash their breasts discretely in a store but it's legal for someone to walk in with a loaded handgun.

I recall Sally Struthers once lamenting that if a movie depicted a man cutting off a woman's nipple it got a PG rating. If it depicted a man kissing a woman's nipple it got an R Rating.

I'd better quit while I'm ahead!

04-15-21  05:46am

Reply To Message

4

Avory (0) Agree with rearadmiral that your review is quite representative of the content. Well done!

I've lamented only one thing in the FTVMilf site as well as the evolution of FTVGirls, and that's the considerable preoccupation with toys. I understand the masturbation angle is the draw, but I'm there for the women, not the various featured implements.

Greater interactivity with the viewer would be preferred, and that comes from explicit posing, something we saw more of in FTV's earlier days. That means fewer toys, more pussy spreads, more held open asses, more intimate views all around, not just as an occasional bone thrown to those of us who prefer seeing a model smile at us and show us what she's got.

Aside from that quibble, I find so much to like about both FTV sites and count me among those relieved that FTVX never materialized. Making that work--and its emphasis--might very well have undermined what made FTV so special to begin with.

06-14-21  01:06am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.