Strokies (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A newer handjob, tease site I had never heard of until now.
- Much more than just a typical handjob site with pussy grinding, women masturbating themselves with one hand and see bottom line.
- Very big site for this genre with 398 models and 506 scenes.
- Updates once per week and download speeds are good (80% of max).
- Downloadable photos from the videos, they are screencaps, but they seem to go through and pick out the best moments for the photo sets.
- Easiest navigation I have seen in a long time. High quality site all-around. Has a tag system but would almost put that in cons since they need more specific tags.
- Rare blend of models for this genre. See bottom line. |
| Cons: |
- Some of the female action parts won’t appeal to everyone. A lot of it is the woman fully nude straddling the man’s leg and humping his leg while giving the handjob.
- This one always comes up with me on all handjob sites. More tease. Will explain in bottom line.
- The company that owns the site has 3 other sites including a public handjob site. For the premium price, I would like to see them at least add the Public Handjobs site to Strokies. |
| Bottom Line: |
Handjob sites are some of the most difficult sites to review since there’s usually not a lot going on in the scene. These guys at Strokies are trying to change that. Most of these scenes last over 30 minutes. I’m used to handjob scenes lasting 8-12 minutes. A very important part of handjob sites are the models. Models can show their worst side in handjob scenes. Especially the ones that try to talk dirty throughout the scene and end up saying the same 8 phrases repeatedly, “It’s so big”, “It’s so hard”, “Are you going to cum for me?” Some of the ones here are guilty of it too. I don’t want to go into a lecture but Howard Stern once did an episode where him and two of the other guys on his show brought in women to talk “dirty” to them. Only one “passed” and it was because she told them what she was going to do to them. She didn’t ask them questions which of course breaks the man’s concentration. Can you just see a man fingering a woman or giving her oral and stopping to ask if she’s going to orgasm? At least I’m laughing about it since that direct style of “dirty talk” and asking questions does nothing but annoy me.
What I established there is the importance of the model to a handjob scene. Not what she looks like, not how great her body is but instead how her personality is. It breaks down this simply: Does she just want you to cum to get the scene over (Are you going to cum for me?) or is she loving it and wanting to please you (I want your cum all over me). When I see that popping up on handjob sites, I’m going to expect some royalties.
This site does so many things right. They have a clear model list with nice, easy to see pictures of the model, they have a “videos” section. That’s where all the updates are. They have one extra tab, a “live” button which takes you to webcams. It’s unobtrusive. The only ads are 3 small ones at the bottom of the pages. When you click on a scene you can stream the video, read the tags and download the videos in 240p, 480p, 720p and 1080p. The pictures are just below the video downloads, you can view them or download them in a zip. Why can’t every site be this easy to use? It’s not like it’s a tiny site with nearly 400 models and just over 500 scenes.
I wish I could tell you if these are known models but I haven’t been following recent porn that much. The women are the prettiest and best range I have seen on a handjob site. There are Persian, Asian, Latina, black, white, even one dressed up like a Leprechaun. That’s one of the reasons for the high score. They are trying to improve a stale genre. Seeing handjob scenes that last 35 minutes is very unusual.
I have looked over the majority of the content and have not only seen some models I do know (Cindy Starfall, longtime favorite), but also noticed a lot of the older scenes don’t have tags. Other than that, in watching the Cindy Starfall scene to give an idea of how a handjob scene can last 30 minutes or more, she strips, she teases, she masturbates a little for the first 10 minutes of the video which is great to me. I did notice her scene is more of a straightforward handjob scene. In contrast one of the newer scenes I really like is of Mia Kay. The first five minutes or so is the guy talking to her and the entire time she’s giving a clear view of her panties up her skirt without making it look too obvious. She’s naked and masturbating to a very wet orgasm by 12 minutes in and then the handjob starts. That is something I have talked about in past reviews of all handjob sites. Why not let the woman masturbate before the handjob so it’s a good show for the viewer and it turns her on? Her thigh-riding stops with her licking the guy’s thigh where she was grinding her pussy. By 20 minutes in, she’s leaning back, fingering herself with one hand still giving the guy a handjob. Nearing the end, she turns around and sits on the guy’s face and keeps giving him a handjob until he cums. There’s even some mouth and tongue teasing on the head.
I won’t go too high with the score since I’m not happy about having to pay again for their Public Handjobs site which I don’t think has near as many videos as this site and I would still like to see more pussy on dick tease, butt on dick tease. There’s very little else to complain about. I don’t really have a list of sites I join on a regular basis anymore, but this one if nothing else is going to keep me around for more than one month so I can get all the scenes I want. I will then visit it periodically to get the new updates. Very nice surprise from a site I hadn’t ever heard of. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
