Watch 4 Beauty (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- My favorite of the photo sites and it helps that they have good videos too.
- There's no way to say this for sure but they have one of the most diverse collections of models. That is what pushes them ahead for me.
- An artsy, glam, site that has masturbation videos and models you've never seen before.
- They are currently running a promo for only $9.95 for a month, $94 a year or $399 lifetime.
- Can join through Paypal via Epoch which is a major pro. Some sites I have joined through Paypal do not have an easy way to cancel. Going through Epoch makes it easy and my bank doesn't send "possible fraud" emails when it's Paypal.
- My score was hard to give and is solely based on the quality of the models, the picture quality and the videos. See the bottom line for an explanation as there are some problems here.
- Fast downloads (90% of max)
- See bottom line about updates and dates on scenes. |
| Cons: |
- Endless scrolling page which is no fun for us PC users.
- The overall navigation needs changed.
- Can't count the number of scenes since I get tired of scrolling. |
| Bottom Line: |
I understand that a site with 3 major cons should not be a 98. I also understand a site that has this many varied race/looks but all pretty models showing everything and even masturbating should be a 100.
Watch4Beauty has been a site I have followed for years. I always liked Met-Art, Femjoy, the softer sites that focused on pictures and started becoming a little less softcore, but Watch4Beauty always stood out to me.
Here you will see what I mean
Sofi Vega, Li Moon, Denise Gomez, Genebra Belluci, Valery Ponce and that's just me looking over the ones I recently downloaded. They still have your favorite models from this genre like Little Caprice, Maria Rya and the more known, more common models in this genre but it's those you don't see on any of the other sites in this genre that separates Watch4Beauty.
The scenery is as good as any site. You just notice it when the model moves a little to the right or left. The content of this site makes it.
But the navigation is shit. There are no tags. There used to be tags (see next paragraph). I understand that this style of website (ever-scrolling page of content) is to make it easier to view on mobile devices. I can appreciate that but they need to put a button on there to switch it from a desktop browser site to a mobile site. I know that exists and is easy to do. I have had blogs and forums for 20 years.
Everyone can get a laugh at my expense and also learn how this site works. I could not find the dates on the scenes. I could not find the tags. There's a little female outline of a head up in the corner of your screen, top right side if you're looking at the screen. I clicked it and there was the date is was published, the tags, the model's full name and all the information I thought they had removed. It's still there, it's just you have to click on the little head outline.
Did looking at all these sexy models mess with their programmer's head? Here is that information, the site updates 5 times a week by my count. If it's wrong, blame their thinking of putting the scene information in an outline of a head. I am laughing and having a good time with this but really, when you click on the outline of the head, it opens up a full information page about the scene and the download button flashes red like I don't know what the download button means? Why didn't the outline of the head flash? I spent a week looking for the scene information.
What you have once you get through that above part is a softcore done right. The masturbation is rarely frantic or wild. It's sensual and sexy. The technical quality is also very high.
The newer videos have a 4K option and a 1080p option. That's it. Besides some of their videos being masturbation, the non-masturbation ones are sometimes even sexier with the model on the bed or in a chair, spreading her legs, opening her pussy while staring into the camera. It's an overused word but this site does sensual as well as any site. It's hard for me to call these young women seductive. They're half my age. You could blend sensual with seductive to describe the videos.
In my previous review of this site, I talked about their pictures being better than many sites videos and that's still true. I've been around porn long enough to be able to still claim I was a picture "guy" back before we got fast internet. I just love the picture sets on Watch4Beauty. I wish they had samples so I could suggest one for you to go look at. Valery Ponce in the photo set called, "So Cute Girl". The editing, the order of the photos, the progression, it shows why this type or porn really didn't need to add videos.
The photo sets start with a tease. They progress to topless, then bottomless, you're all built up and waiting for the next photo to see what they're going to show next. Was that what they meant when the word "Art" was added to porn? If so, I agree.
Besides the great everything, except hiding the scene information in an outline of a head, I listed the video specs above. The photo sets are downloadable and they are the largest resolution I have seen at 4480x6720. You want life-size views? You get them. These are the first photos I have used my zoom out button on.
I have mostly avoided the talk of that ever-scrolling content page. I use the model list instead. I have the same complaint on Zishy. And I probably complained too much about the outline of the head with the scene information hidden in it but it is also why I feel a 98 is possible. No complaints about the models, no complaints about the camerawork, no complaints about the scenery and setting, no complaints about the editing, far from any complaints about the model selection and the outline of the head is there with the date of release and scene information.
The last downside, there's no way I'm going through all that scrolling to count all the scenes. It is a very big site and there's enough content to keep you busy for easily 3 months, maybe even a year. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
