Wow Girls (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Back to my comfort zone of innocence porn with very pretty young ladies.
The site is huge with 2,250 photo sets and 1,140 videos..
I do not know this for sure, but I believe their quality on their videos has to be close to industry-leading, though not a selling point for me.
Tagging system is useful and does seem to be accurate.
The site includes access to Wow Porn, All Fine Girls and Ultra Films, all are very good sites.
There are roughly 3 video updates and 5 photo updates per week just on Wow Girls.
Uses Vendo as the biller.
Navigation is simple and easy to use, even switching between the sites. |
| Cons: |
There isn’t much to complain about so I will complain that the bonus site Ultra Films requires a separate login. I feel so petty which should be a compliment to the site.
I do believe the male/female scenes could be better. Most sites with young women in this age range do have problems with creating realistic hardcore scenes. |
| Bottom Line: |
This group of sites passed my previous favorite, Nubiles, though I gave them a con on the sexual action, it is overall more realistic and “sexy” than most sites with models in this age range. The best part of that is they do not focus on male/female scenes. There are solo scenes, lesbian scenes and even threesome plus scenes. The models are consistently in that 7-9 range score on that “on a scale of 1-10 in looks”. It is one of the most impressive groups of models I have seen.
They go beyond just giving you pretty and sexy young women to look at. Their quality includes some I didn’t even know existed like 6K videos. The regular newer scenes have 720p, 1080p and 4K downloads. There also is an option to choose whether you want 30 frames per second or 60 frames per second. This is all getting complicated and confusing. I can’t tell a big difference between the different frame rates. They also have around 50-60 of their newer videos with 6K downloads.
The quality doesn’t stop on the videos. Their picture sets have four download options: 4000px, 2000px, 1000px and Original. The Original option photos are 5760x3240 in resolution and are some of the best looking pictures I have seen.
The tagging system is surprisingly helpful. I usually do not use the tagging system on sites. There is always a question of how accurate those are. Maybe it’s just that they don’t really have any bad photo sets or videos and I don’t notice the accuracy or inaccuracy?
The scenes are kind of formulaic which can be seen by the running time of the videos. You will rarely see a video over 30 minutes, even if there are as many as 6 or 8 people in the scene. That is not something to really complain about, but these are very much produced and directed scenes that are not going to make you think there’s much spontaneity. I assume with females and males in this younger age range there needs to be direction and the scenes are at least mostly all over 20 minutes.
I do enjoy the solo scenes the most, especially the longer ones, with some being in the 25 minute range, though I do believe that does show how directed the multiple person scenes are. There just isn’t much to complain about and I believe my score shows that. This site, to me, is near perfect. If I was going to change anything I would extend the length of the scenes with more than one person in them. I will review the other sites that come with it as I believe there is enough difference between them to explain it. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
