Ass Traffic (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Superior technical quality, anal-centered, including DPs
520 scenes with downloadable photos and videos.
Long scenes (40-60 minutes is common)
Extensive tagging system that may go further than needed.
It is updating, but there is no set schedule and some updates may be questionable with a scene in May seemingly being Christmas-themed.
Pro models with the pros and cons that come with that. |
| Cons: |
Scenes are formulaic despite the long duration.
The updates do concern me. Two some months, 0 in one month, four in one month. It balances out if you have a year membership, but not as good if you’re on a monthly membership.
European pro models can be very inconsistent OR robotic, there’s not a lot of middle ground. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is going to mark off a lot of “good” check boxes. The videos are long, the photo sets are real photo sets, not screencaps, they also have screencaps too and the quality if impressive. Nearly 200 of their 520 scenes have 4K in their download options.
This is an odd one for me. As much as I prefer long scenes, the long scenes on this site do not really have anything to do with story or building of a story. The scenes are just 40-60 minutes of hardcore sex. Their tagging system reminds me of the long length videos too. One scene has 44 tags. Some of the tags are also not very specific like, “watery” and “casual” or “fake” is that fake boobs? Fake action? Fake cum?
The theme doesn’t change in these scenes. It’s very straightforward that you’re going to see all three orifices of the woman penetrated and for those into dual penetration they have a tag for that. They even have tags for dual penetration positions like DP-Cowgirl, DP-Standing, DP-Reverse Cowgirl. I can’t be negative about the action and do think it’s why these professional models are better suited by sites like this. These models seem to be used to the camera, the dual penetration, the rigors of a 40-60 minute hardcore scene, sometimes with two men. It’s very watchable. I usually would feel uncomfortable with scenes like these since so many sites try to show the model in pain or looking like she’s being forced. This site gets a “good job” star on their report card for making clean, watchable, sexy, visually pleasing porn.
The download options are also extensive: It does look like they may encode their videos a little high. They have 4K, 1080p, 720p, 540p, mobile, a high res photo zip file that has photos that are 5700x3600 resolution and a screenshots zip download.
I believe it just comes down to your mood. You’re not going to get much story. The models are very attractive and seem to not only enjoy the scenes, but even give very real performances. It’s polished porn, but I believe in this hardcore of a niche that’s not that common. This niche seems more suited for a dark room with a couple of amateurs. I like the site. On the videos and the encoding, the 720p videos are encoded at 4500-5000 bitrate and it does make the files large, especially when combined with the length of the scenes. Some of the 4K scenes are nearly 20GB each. Complaining about a site excelling at something isn’t much of a complaint. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
