Erotica X (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- An attempt to create hardcore porn that has some story and is not too hardcore. It's multitasking porn.
- Hit or miss from scene to scene but the hits are good enough to make it a pro.
- Some scenes are as long as 45 minutes and there is variety in the settings.
- Probably could be a con too, updating twice per month. Large enough site in a relatively rare niche to offset the slower update schedule.
- Download speeds are good to very good at 85% of my max.
- Easy navigation including a feature I don’t see very often. You can download the scene without clicking on it. There is a download in the upper left hand corner of the scene preview with download options that show up when you hover over it.
- Everything is professional from the models, to the production values, to the site design
- Good range of different model types (race, body type, etc) |
| Cons: |
- Some of the scenes try way too hard to not be hardcore. Bordering on mushiness. That’s where the miss in the hit or miss comes from.
- The numbers of scenes they show the site having are not the same as when you get inside. This one shows 715 but once you click on the site there are only 373. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is what happens when you try to do something creative with a gonzo premise. You make the male and female performers have to show their acting ability. The problem with that on this site is there is a reliance on a small group of male performers, who are all well-known professionals with the females changing from scene to scene. Some examples of this include: Mia Malkova has the most scenes of any female on this site with 12. The second most for females is a tie between Valentina Nappi and Aidra Fox with 8 and fourth in Adriana Chechik with 7. The top four males are: Seth Gamble with 51 scenes, James Deen with 33 scenes, Danny Mountain with 27 scenes and Tyler Nixon with 25 scenes. Those four guys are in roughly 1/3 of the scenes. If the scenes didn’t rely on showing the guy as the story develops then it probably wouldn’t be as noticeable but you are getting in the area of overexposure and I’m not talking about nudity. Most of the females besides the 4 that I listed have 1-3 scenes. Since this style of porn is promoting chemistry or even love and passion between the actors and actresses, it does make it difficult to believe these guys are capable of loving 25-50 different women.
The site and scenes are mostly good, though. And it’s because of the female models. There are maybe 5 female models I didn’t find attractive but they are also models you likely know like the 4 listed above, Abella Danger, AJ Applegate, Jade Kush, Emily Willis and so on.
The disappointing part for me is the inconsistency from scene to scene. You watch a good scene then see another one that has a model you are interested in and watch it only to get poor performances. The best scenes I have watched are the ones without the overused models. Which does magnify the possible problem here. I get the feeling some of the actors and actresses are just not into the acting needed to pull these types of scenes off.
The amount of scenes is 373. Those all have videos and photos. There is a daily download limit of 300 GB. I am not even for sure the entire site has 300 GB of content on it. The video quality is very good. The most recent 135 scenes have 4K download option on the videos. Even if you go back to the oldest scenes those have 1080p. The oldest scenes seem to have some kind of theme/story tied directly to each scene. The preview for the scenes shows a title similar to a mainstream movie advertising poster, complete with “featuring (model’s name)”. There really isn’t much to dislike other than the requiring non-actors to be actors. The photos are good and could be even better. These photo sets are large (200+ photos) and the female model is the focus of the photo set, usually fully clothed for the first 15 photos, then teasing 30-50 photos in. The resolution is the only thing holding those back at around 2000 on the long end.
It’s a good site that I believe could be better if they mixed up the male usage or relied less on acting ability if they can’t find more males. It’s worth checking out if you like hardcore that isn’t “porn hardcore”. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
