Dark X (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Interracial, high-quality porn, that could use a new casting director.
- Good sized site with 266 scenes but it’s only updating once per month.
- The video quality is very good and there’s not a lot of drop in quality in the older scenes.
- Download speeds are good (80% of my max).
- Easy site to join and cancel, good sorting features but those can be confusing (see bottom line).
- If you like hardcore with as much story as “Where the Wild Things Are” this is a good site. |
| Cons: |
- Jax Slayher, easily the most annoying male talent in porn today. I don’t get that. I don’t think anyone pays to look at the back of someone’s hand. I will try to see if the navigation will tell me how many scenes he’s in. He completely ruins the scenes.
- The site is big enough to overcome the small amount of updates but it doesn’t have a lot of personality to the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
(uploaded wrongly as All Black X, corrected and fixed both)
This is another of the X Empire sites. It’s not a bad site at all. I do have an admitted problem with the male talent named Jax Slayher. The rest of the guys on this site do their jobs well. This Jax Slayher guy, he is this generation’s Lee Stone, not with a broken dick. Stone liked to step on the model’s face. Slayher likes to cover the faces with his hand. I don’t know if he’s uncoordinated and needs to balance. Look at the model list, he is in 23 scenes so you can subtract those from the 266. The worst part is, they seem to cast him with the female models I really like, like Ember Snow. I do believe it’s because most of the scenes are cookie-cutter. I don’t think they even think about the casting. They probably flip a coin or maybe they have literal pissing contests to see who gets to be in the scenes with the prettiest models.
The cookie-cutter concept to these scenes makes it where the big selling point is the female model. I said it before and will always believe this, the most important part of a porn scene that’s not a fetish, is whether you’re attracted to the model. That can overcome a lot. The scenes follow a similar script. The scenes are almost all in the same house or a house that looks the same. They have a couch that appears in more scenes than any of the models. I don’t know if I need to explain the script. But here goes: Starts out with some touching, a little kissing, and by 2:30 she’s sucking his dick. She will spend 4-6 minutes gagging on the guy’s dick. It just skips him giving her oral. And jumps to somehow, anal with fingers in the pussy by the 8 minute mark. The anal lasts for 22 more minutes and the scene is over. Outside of the fingers in the pussy, he didn’t even have pussy sex with her. I’m trying to make a point. If you’re going to make cookie-cutter porn at least use every part. What if a person doesn’t like anal? It’s not an anal site. It wouldn’t hurt for 4-5 minutes of that anal sex to be pussy sex. This is what I call clinical porn. Since someone once asked what I meant by clinical, the definition for it is, “Efficient and unemotional, coldly detached.” Perfect explanation for what some of these scenes are. The scenes are recorded to get the scenes over so they can record another. There’s no feeling of connection. It’s not all of the scenes but all of the scenes do follow a script. If the first sex is pussy sex, there’s not going to be anal. They have taken the cookie-cutter approach and made it even more narrow.
It’s a shame because the technical quality is so high. The newer scenes have from 160p to 4K download options. The oldest scenes have from 160p to 1080p download options.
The photo set are good enough at 2000 long end with downloadable zips and a focus on the clothed model for the first 30-50 pictures. That’s why I say it’s a shame to just zoom through the scenes.
The navigation is very good but as mentioned it can be confusing. The reason is they have a section called “Partner Scenes”. These are sites that they have licensed content from other sites that Gamma is partnered with including Team Skeet, Joymii and SexArt to name a few. The problem with that is most of those sites have better production in their scenes. The results of the category searches include the partner scenes.
I don’t think that would be as big of deal if I could figure where the rest of the scenes are that these sites are supposed to have on them. This site says it has 511 scenes. When I click on it, it has 266. All their sites are like that. There’s plenty to work on here. You get some of the top female models in the world. Have very good technical quality. Is it that hard to count the scenes? Or hire someone to say, “You know what, the last 200 scenes we filmed followed the exact pattern.” This network as a whole is good but it wears on you to the point that when you’re nearing the end of your subscription you’re glad.
The attractive women for the win again. That’s your selling point here. Check the model list before joining and make sure there are models you like and hope they’re not in a scene with Jax Slayher. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
