Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (0)

Newbie
73*
avgazn86 (0) 12-22-21  12:57pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: *Top talents in the business make appearances
*New talents are consistently featured with some talent that are hard to find anywhere else
*Consistent updates; two scenes daily
*Very wide range and amount of content to select from
Cons: *Many sites are not updating at all or very little
*Everything is basically for "RK Prime" for some reason
*Site went through a "face lift" which made navigation harder
*Photosets progressively got worse
*4k not available...still...
Bottom Line: I first joined the site off and on since 2009, and have seen many changes over the course of 12 years. Some good, some bad, and now it seems like another MindGeek heist with the management of the site.

Throughout the years, the sites that were something to look forward to when it came to updates were First Time Auditions (last update was Dec. 2020) with only 195 updates, Pure 18 (last update was Sept. 2020) with only 158 scenes), Big Naturals (last update was Dec. 2020) with 380 updates, and Teens Love Huge Cocks (last update was Oct. 2020) with only 329 updates.

Where have all the updates gone to? Why abandon their bread and butter? Well, to answer that question, they have and have not. Which makes it seem like they are attempting to "rebrand" without giving it a label. Every thing is being dumped into one site. RK Prime.

RK Prime is the lazy solution to the multisite it seems. You will find that many of the scenes they post for this site should be put into the other sites. By doing this, it makes it seem like most of the site is being neglected. Are they really being neglected? When you start looking around on IAFD and other database sites you will find that they also have deleted or lost scenes, as well. This is a common thing across all MindGeek run sites.

Overall, the content is almost the same, but the climate is changing as such that the sites that made RK and reputable name in the adult multisite biz is now looking a bit lazy. The marketing ploy to bolster "all these sites" with "all these models" looks a little like a wolf in sheep's clothing with a handful of the newer scenes becoming more and more gimmicky with a weird and very niche twist. If one were to buy, you would be buying for the name, which is fine. A name can be dependable to an extent and are guaranteed a product of its name with their older content, but a name can only carry you so far before realizing the potential that other sites can bring and take you to.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to avgazn86!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.