Pansexual X (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Newer site that can have a blend of porn genres in each scene.
Updated regularly, but there is no set schedule.
Mostly attractive men, women and transsexuals.
There are only 39 scenes currently, but all 39 have up to 4K downloads on videos.
Seems like a genre or niche with unlimited potential, but that creates cons, too.
Had a billing problem, but the chat was friendly and fixed it. |
| Cons: |
This plays off the pro about the potential. It feels like they are going to need a lot of time to really figure out the direction to take this site.
Too many non-porn scenes considering there are only 39 scenes. There are interviews and behind the scenes videos mixed in.
It goes without saying, so I will say it, there will be a lot of people turned away from this genre. |
| Bottom Line: |
PansexualX is a site that tries to mix standard straight sex with bisexual sex and adds transsexuals plus transgender models. This sounds really good in thought. The first and clearest problem to me is there are scenes with 2 models. I understand that when it’s a straight site. I don’t understand it when you are promoted as a site that covers straight, bi and transsexual. I want to say three models in each scene should be the minimum. There is even a solo scene. That shows the part about it feels like they don’t know which direction to take the site. Of the 39 scenes, there is one sex scene with more than 2 people. One. Each scene has a behind the scenes, interview and sex video. I could be mistaken on this, but the last time I was a member there were scenes from their other transsexual sites on this one. Those have been removed and replaced with the new scenes.
I was going to review it the last time I was a member but noticed how many scenes were from their other sites. That has changed now, but I even get the feeling the site is losing momentum. The update schedule started out as nearly weekly. It then switched to twice per month (3 scenes in each) and now it’s once per month. The site only started in June 2021.
The one big positive is the video quality. There are 8 download resolutions starting at 160p and ending at 4K.
My feeling about what I see on this site: A transsexual and bisexual site. It’s not even as good of a transsexual sites as their other transsexual sites and the bisexual parts are not that good. The sex scenes are longer (in the 30 minutes range), but the feeling of not knowing what direction to go in is even in the scenes. One scene stands out and is possibly the only scene I will keep from the site. It has Adriana Chechik and Aspen Brooks (transsexual) in it. Even the interview video for it is very good. Most of the rest of the scenes – despite big name stars (I wouldn’t know the names if they weren’t stars), have a generic feel to them. The interviews seem to be there to replace any functioning story in the scenes. Maybe they can salvage this site and reach the potential, but the pairings show it’s not going much beyond transsexual sites. Only one one-fourth of the scenes have a female in them. It’s more leaning towards transsexuals with men and transsexuals with transsexuals which is what a transsexual site usually is. As someone that collects transsexual with women, I was expecting to see that in every scene, but I was also expecting to see more than 2 people in the majority of the scenes. I don’t see it pushing any boundaries at this point. It’s a transsexual site. I do know the term “pansexual” is used loosely in current times, but why not just call it another transsexual site? Maybe I am being too critical? I just believe when you have a couple of the best transsexual sites on your network, then you add this new site that is promoted as something groundbreaking, I expect to see something besides what would only be average transsexual scenes on their other transsexual sites. Which is the percentage to know, 100% of the scenes have a transsexual in them. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
