Naughty Mag (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Deep sleeper site that comes from the Score Group.
Their speciality is pictures in a magazine-style layout.
Videos are not as common, but newer ones are 4K.
Pictures are downloadable. Most have a 3000x2000 download resolution.
Models range from amateur to pro-amateur.
Almost 5,000 models |
| Cons: |
Bonus sites are not even worth looking at. All three sites included as bonus sites stopped updating in 2014 or earlier and the three combined do not offer large collections.
Videos could stand more production and direction. The videos seem more like a bonus to the photo sets.
Picture sets outnumber videos 4 to 1. |
| Bottom Line: |
As a breast-aficionado, the Score Group, has been a longtime destination for my porn money to go to. Naughty Mag does not follow the Score Group’s love of only large-breasted models. I am sure the models being amateur to pro-amateur plays a part in the decision not to focus just on large breasts, but I didn’t even notice. Naughty Mag is the perfect name for this site. Every memory you have of opening a porn magazine as a teenager will flood back into your mind when you look at all these sexy models. Most if not all breasts are all-natural, but some are very small up to medium-large.
The site includes 3 bonus sites. Those are Bored At Home, Porn Loser and Naughty Tugs. They should not even mention these as bonus sites. Two have not been updated in over a decade. The collections are not very large and these scenes and photo s would be just as well-served as Naughty Mag releases. The other issue is with the amount of videos and if the videos are even worth downloading. I will say yes, but the videos are not the focus and should be viewed that way. Any other expectations will bring a letdown.
You should join it with the knowledge and understanding of you’re here for the pictures. The pictures are not only high quality, but feature some of the best lighting you will find in porn pictures. The models, while mostly amateur, are excellent at posing and the photographer gets the best angles. I would even suggest the pictures on Naughty Mag are close to the same league as the Met-Art sites.
There is hardcore content and that may surprise some. The site is promoted more as softcore, and it is, but there’s some hardcore and it at least confirms the videos go beyond posing or teasing. Even so, you’re still better off looking at the pictures.
For me,the make or break point for this site, s centered around your attraction to the models. I find their models to be the prettiest collection of amateur models, and that greatly benefits the site. If anyone knows of a prettier collection of amateur models, I would like to know what site so I can join it. There may be some nostalgic bias based on me loving old pin-up and “girly magazines” but I am sure no one would be disappointed with this content as long as they understand the difference between quantity of photos to videos.
It is one of my favorite sites and is the only amateur site (not on a network) that I join. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
