MetArt (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The world’s top softcore, photography-focused site.
Multiple daily updates
Pretty models even if nearly interchangeable with each other
Videos are included, but I can’t say I download them for anything other than reviewing purposes.
Photos can be downloaded in zip files.
Intriguing trial offers to Met-Art’s other sites. |
| Cons: |
Redundant, boring, dull, repetitive are adjectives you may use if you stay around for more than a month at a time.
Though not really distracting there are a lot of ads for Met-Art’s other sites |
| Bottom Line: |
Starting with the main and first con, Met-Art’s beauty is in young, innocent women being naked for the camera. Met-Art’s biggest hurdle is keeping those scees from all being similar. They mostly succeed at that, but not fully. I really can’t offer a suggestion.
If quality is important to you then you will be happy to knoow the photo resolution is near the top of the industry and while the videos are relatively boring, those are downloadable in high definition.
Multiple daily updates keep things fresh enough.
The positives far outweigh the cons, but I will say the longer you are a member, the more noticeable the flaws are. The models are all attractive, but with a long-term membership you may start to feel like you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all.
That colud be the best advice I can give you about Met-Art. Join it in bursts instead. Even saying that, it’s not a bad site to start your own porn collection.
The photos can by downloded in zip fles and the videos can be downloaded in multiple resolutions and quality. This is one of the few sites that I even mention the backgrounds and settings about.
There is a trial going on currently where they give you access to one or even ten of the Met-Art sites. It’s a good way to get at least a sampling of their content. Each site seems to have a boundary up. Though Met-Art is more explicit than ever, it still often doesn’t even reach masturbation. The trials to their other sites may also show you which models obviously are not comfortable doing anything more than teasing on camera.
The toughest part of reviewing Met-Art is no other site than I know of has such a low dependency on their videos. It has made me wonder why they even film videos. I know there is a market of video lovers, but these videos aren’t going to impress a video lover. The videos even look like someone recorded a video of a photographer taking pictures of the models.
Met-Art is still at the top of the heap in porn photogrephy, but if videos are the least bit important to you joining a site, you may want to skip Met-Art. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
