Pornstar Platinum Network (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- This is the type of network us solo model lovers always wanted.
- 21 sites included and 20 of them are solo model sites.
- Pretty easy to navigate even though it’s cluttered.
- Downloads cost extra but it’s only $12 more.
- It helps if some of the models are favorites.
- Promo price plus downloads is around $20. |
| Cons: |
- It’s professional models, nearly all solo sites of pro models have problems. Some of the models only seem a little invested in their performances.
- Really no reason to join for more than a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
Back in the mid-2000s, I used to talk about how I wished solo sites, that were no longer updating, would join together and make a big network. Who knew time was the only thing I needed to get that wish? There are several pornstar networks with a dozen or two solo sites. Your preference will be based on which models you like the most. One of my favorites on Pornstar Platinum is GiGi Rivera. She is a good example of why this type of network never was very popular. She has a small collection of videos and photos and none of the videos come close to the level she performed at on other sites. She even looks uncomfortable.
There is the other side too, though. Angelina Valentina, a once semi-popular pornstar known for hardcore scenes. She is easily one of the best solo models I have seen and that’s saying a lot. Her site is so impressive, I’m going to include sort of a mini-review below of it.
The big name stars include Amy Brooke, Ava Devine and Ariella Ferrera. Those three have a combined 500+ videos and 500+ photosets. There are 16 more plus Angelina Valentina. I really don’t know how much of this content used to be on solo sites that required a membership for each site. I do know this is a great deal even if you pay for the downloads. I would even say joining without the downloads is more of a ripoff than paying for the downloads.
This network reminds me of why I preferred solo models for the first 10 years of my porn interest. Solo scenes show the model’s personality and it’s sometimes what makes the difference between models I didn’t collect and did collect.
Angelina Valentine’s site shows what most of us have figured out. Some models are much better in solo scenes. Angelina Valentine is one of those models who makes nearly perfect solo content. The plus with her is she was considered one of the better hardcore models of her time. This network has around 100 videos of Angelina and over 200 photosets. I’m just going to take a guess and say Angelina didn’t have 200 photosets from all of her combined sets. She is naturally seductive, which is nearly impossible to find in solo porn, but she pulls it off. Her site was enough for me to be happy with my money well spent.
We are getting a lesson in solo/hardcore porn differences. Most solo models are very young, barely legal and the producers and directors know that and like it. It shows the shy young woman struggling to perform for a stranger behind the camera. You put women like Angelina Valentine In a solo scene, she was already established as a pornstar and it shows. She effortlessly performs solo porn.
Each of the models is worth checking out on their individual site. There’s a lot of good content, some great and you get some great picture sets too.
It's a good site, but admittedly, there’s not much reason to recur your membership of go back to the site unless you just didn’t get what you wanted downloaded.
The network will make solo fans happy and let me stress this, not all the content is solo. There is a lot of hardcore mixed in, but it’s unlikely you’ll find these many solo videos and photosets of most of these models. That should be the selling point for potential members. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
