Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Good review Denner. I don't get why you've been given 99 points instead of the 100 (i.e., 2 pts for this review), so you can graduate cum laude with the Hardcore User badge. It's a hellava lot better than the average review here.
I think what's lacking at this site is the spark of excitement. The girls are lovely but they pose as directed and are shot from the photographer's POV. I just saw Jamie Lynn's latest at DD, and it was just another disappointment! It could have been a real sweetie, 'cause I've seen her turn on the charm before. But these gets have the girls looking down, looking away, keeping their eyes closed, being too detached. 3000px don't matter then!
And there's not enough good ass either. At least the very recent redux of Phoenix Ray had a nice one of her in a futt-buck pose, now at 1600px. And she was alive enough before the camera. Doesn't happen nearly enough at this site.
|
12-09-07 10:47am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Well, Drooler
Tha Admin at PU did not find it great, just GOOD, according to a reply from Khan.
So I live with 99 for the time beeing.
Congrat. with the new HD badge - I'll come after it, I think -but for a period I'll be out on the road....
best
Denner
|
12-11-07 10:13am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
zachvenice (Suspended)
|
Sorry to hear that you weren't completely satisfied with our site, Denner. I would only like to add that we do not boast ourselves as being a hardcore site. And even though some of our sets are from our archives (we have been shooting for over 20 years), we focus on quality rather than quantity. We shoot only the best models and take time to produce exquisite images. Nonetheless, atleast half of our monthly updates are new and exclusive. If you check out our tour, you'll see we have nothing to hide.
|
04-23-08 02:36pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
