Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit TDF Girls

TDF Girls (0)

Drooler (0) 12-15-07  08:28am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)

Sleaze Served Slowly

The worst thing about this site is the slow server speed. Click to the next page of a gallery and you might need something on the side to do while U wait. And it takes about 10 secs from right clicking "Save Target As ..." on a zip before it's even ready to start downloading.

The zip files are actually at 1900px and the file size of a pic from the zip is considerably larger (by 2-3 times) than the 1800px you get with a single saved pic. Some zips are like 90mb.

Some pics lack good color, er ... "colour." It's a British site.

Not all of the girls are "To Die For." One in particular had a little too much of a Charles Bronson thing for my taste. But most are cute and/or hot. They don't always get totally bare-nekked-nude, though.

Seeing they had "Roxanna" really got me interested, but their pics of her didn't do it for me ass-wise. (She's got a scar on her back; was that the reason? Doesn't matter to me!) She's easily the finest babe on this site. (Didn't need to have that boob job done, either.)

Navigating is a pain. Always have to return to the model list, then a model's section, to see her next gallery. And the "prev" links in the gallery pages don't work at all; only "first," "next," and "last" do.

One more thing. The price they display, $29.99, is "rubbish." It's $34.95 for a month.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Toadsith (0) Thanks for the warning - sounds like a site I'll skip over. That whole advertising a lower price than what they charge is really sketchy.

The best site for British porn (well non-boy/girl hardcore porn) that I've found is still Simon Scans. I haven't reviewed it because I've been gone for too long (March, 2007). Cheers!

12-16-07  01:50pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - Toadsith :

Good. No need for both of us to be kicking ourselves. I really went out on a limb with this one. Crrrack! Aahhhhhhhhhhhhh!
12-16-07  02:23pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.