Review Replies (7)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I rejoined recently after being away about a year. I agree more with your opinion of this site. The blurry and grainy photos are irritating and I think inexcusable.
They recently had some nice new stuff of Carli Banks and Jamie Lynn, separately and together, but the poses were only partly good.
Also, for a site these days, there should be standard access to photos at 3000+ as an option in their regular galleries. I hate the way they pick certain photos and put them, quite seldomly, into separate "mega-sized" collections and then don't even give you previews of what you'll be getting. They waste their own bandwidth by making it necessary for a user to download the large zips of those pics, only to possibly toss them out, gallery after gallery. That's what I've done. And of course it wastes the user's time, too.
And oh, even though they've recently raised their bandwidth limit again, it's still obviously contrary to have us downloading large files of what we might reject (having no preview) and THEN having a bandwidth limit, too! Ridiculous.
The site has an attractive design, but I've never been very impressed by what really counts, the content.
I've never understood why this site gets such high marks by some, but there's just no accounting for tastes, I guess.
|
12-18-07 09:31am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
PosterDude (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
That why I was so mad at TBP people for there false review. Because of TBP I waste my money and now do not trust site reviews. Maybe Ftv pay people to get high review.
I try best to give good propper review of sites and be honest. You do good reviews and should review Ftv. Not many updates for money made me most sad and I for got to list bandwidth limit as bad to. It is over I just move on to much better sites.
|
12-18-07 01:47pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - PosterDude :
As far as TBP is concerned, I've been burned enough times myself by trusting their reviews that anymore, I mostly check them for new site listings or the pure data they provide and not the more subjective impressions they have.
Even the data can be wrong, too, though, as I've experienced as well (e.g., "full-trial" when it's not).
I don't think that the TBP reviewers are dishonest or taking bribes, but they don't seem to have the same kinds of in-depth experiences with sites that we at PU have. Frankly, I think they're a pretty shallow and incompetent lot. They could at least tell us how large the pics are, but they just don't. I think, "Aren't they supposed to review what's on the site??"
Thank God they don't review automobiles! (Skid ... crash!!)
And there are people at PU who say we should be members of a site for at least a month before writing a review, but you don't seee them saying that to the TBP reviewers.
Thanks again for the "straight from the hip" review of FTV Girls.
|
12-18-07 03:49pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
jd1961 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :
They certainly don't take money, if they did they wouldn't allow our negative reviews. It's all about the "clicks"!
|
12-27-07 04:20am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - jd1961 :
That's what I think, too. Sometimes I'll read a review at TBP but visit the site by just typing in the address outside of TBP. It's gotten to that point.
|
12-27-07 07:25am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Davit (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - PosterDude :
PosterDude, I don't think TBP take back handers from any porn company to give good reviews. But the bottom line is: don't trust those reviews, or any other professional review site's reviews. Only pay attention to independent user reviews. At least that's my motto.
Professional reviews nearly always seem to be in the late 80s and upwards. They're just not truly reflective of the reality out there. Some sites barely merit more than 10/100. And these review sites often review many dozens of pay sites, so I'm suspicious that they have either the time or money to do this properly.
I reckon a good proportion of professional reviews out there are based solely on the free tours! So no wonder they're artificially high!
Not saying that's the case with TBP, but is just a general suspicion of mine.
Regards.
|
01-20-08 10:50am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
BostonPJR (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Davit :
Agreed. Although I don't know about "artificially high" seems like on the sites I like, I am consistently 5 points higher than TBPs reviewer. And I'm sure not getting any kickbacks.
|
07-26-08 11:15am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
