| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
jd1961 (0)
|
I've never been a member. When I click on their preview page, I'm getting error messages. Is the site working at the moment? Happy New Year!
|
12-31-07 04:20pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :
Hey JD,
Happy 2008!
The site is plagued with server problems, seems to me, and it's been that way for quite some time. I really wish they'd started their makeover a little further under the hood instead of doing this paint job first.
And who knows when, or if, those images (especially some earlier ones) marked as 4000px actually will be. Could it become another Superglamish fiasco? Let's hope not, but only time will tell. One thing's for sure, it's not good practice doing it the way they've done it.
With updates, EVERY damn web site in existence should do it from "the inside out" (bottom to top of the directory tree) but a lot of them do it bass-ackwards instead, announcing updates or changes that aren't online yet. MetArt and MetModels, two otherwise great sites, are among the guilty, although Met-Art has been updating a lot earlier in the day than they used to (Yay!).
|
01-01-08 01:09am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
Hey again
Rather cool design - it looks great....
Still I'm more on the 78 from your review concerning content. I don't know what it is, but apart from the fine models some things are still missing to make this a great site.
Maybe it lacks some real sensuallity, some sexier ways in photos and videos - even some of the Playboy videos - and photos for that matter - are more sexy than MCN.
|
01-01-08 03:16pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
Yeah, I just made a summary statement in the review that there's too much "detached" posing -- what jd1961 coined as "JC Penny poses" because the models sometimes seem like mannequins. That's the lack of sensuality that you're talking about.
It really is a fundamental problem with the site, I think. I'd just like there to be more personality and a sense of "being with" coming through. Some of models like Susana Spears, Marketa, and Marina/Euprhat put it out pretty nicely, but that's because they're naturals at it -- so it seems to me. But they are among the exceptions!
|
01-01-08 04:40pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
jd1961 (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :
Wow, I can't believe it I actually coined a phrase! I've been avoiding this site and now you confirm my suspicions.
|
01-01-08 05:18pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Mayvary (0)
|
Hey Drooler,
mcn did not standardized their image sizes! They still offer and going to release more up to 5000 px galleries ... so you must hit them up in the middle of making the last tweaks to the site :D
Cya
Mayvary
|
01-09-08 04:40am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Mayvary :
I'll keep an eye out, mostly at PU just in case anyone joins and finds that the pic sizes actually match the sizes under the thumbs in the earlier galleries.
My membership just expired about a week ago and I don't plan on returning for a few months.
|
01-09-08 08:18am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Mayvary (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :
Hi Drooler,
I'll take over int he meantime :D my account will stay long enough to create an overall new review next month (old experires then :D)
Cya around
may
|
01-11-08 03:41am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Mayvary :
Great! Thanks!
|
01-11-08 03:42am
Reply To Message
|
