| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
Well, Denner... I guess it all comes down to personal preference. Sometimes you find yourself going against popular opinion, just like I did with the Brazzer's Network.
I agree with you - there are a lot of clunkers on Videobox - plenty of videos that just plain look bad in any resolution. I just figure that $15 these days, for a menu that large, makes it worth the cost - even if you have to pick through it all to find the keepers.
It's okay - Videobox doesn't work for you and there's plenty of porn out there on other sites. : - )
|
03-08-08 12:10pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
malikstarks (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - RagingBuddhist :
I just checked out your review of Brazzers Pass, and I have to admit that you aren't completeley off the mark. For a site that robust both the picture and video content could be better. In comparison, Reality Kings has far superior pic quality, (not quite sure about the vids).
That said I would have given the site a higher rating than a 70, if for no other reason than the sheer volume of content (and most of it at least watchable). I myself am still a member, basically for the loyalty discount of 9.99 a month I can't see quitting. Too many hot pornstars, even if the content IS a bit repetitive and cliche.
|
03-09-08 04:55pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - malikstarks :
I don't give scores like that at random. Along with what you said (and something I somehow failed to include in my review) about how cliché and repetitive the site is, one of the main reasons I felt the need to subtract points was because of the "in your face" upsells and the way the site wants to set so many cookies. I'm used to all that when I'm surfing for freebies - not when I've paid for the content.
I just honestly think Brazzer's has enough issues that made the experience less than pleasant. It seems a lot of the popular sites kind of sit back and rest on their laurels. By that I mean they don't keep up with the times. Things like picture/video resolution and site navigation should always be a concern to a site. If I can ever figure out how to put it into words that make sense, you'll see what I mean (if and when) I get my review of Overdeveloped Amateurs together.
(He laughs) And just how did we get into a mini review of Brazzer's here?
|
03-09-08 07:48pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
malikstarks (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - RagingBuddhist :
Not to beat a dead horse, but you know what the funny thing is, the most recent poll running the the Brazzerspass site asks: Which possible site improvement would most influence you to keep your membership? Among the choices are, higher quality video (my choice), more sites (I'm like hell no enough already), and others.
Lo and behold boneheaded users of the site have chosen OVERWHELMINGLY that adding yet more sites would help to keep them a member. Mind you this a network with about 20 sites already, many of which have long since been abandoned, go figure.
|
03-12-08 12:53am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
I definitely agree. Quantity galore but very little worth keeping.
|
07-10-08 03:02pm
Reply To Message
|
