Review Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Robare (Suspended)
|
You know, I have to ask...I noticed on your review of Alison Angel, you gave the site a rating of 90. Yet, you gave FTVGirls a rating of 80. Alison got her start on FTVGirls, if I'm not mistaken. Further, Alison got her site format, some content, certainly technical assistance, in fact the basis for her site's existence is FTVGirls. Is there something about having multiple models on a site that's bothersome in this instance? Further, you tagged FTVGirls with a con of it having solo masturbation action only, which is false. And, yet, Alison's site is also predominantly solo masturbation. Why bother stating the content of the site to be a con when the site was never intended to be anything but what it is and never advertised to be anything but what it is? Why bother getting disappointed by setting an unrealistic expectation and then pass on the fact that you disappointed yourself?
|
09-03-07 11:31am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
turismo (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Robare :
Fair points - the reason I gave Alison a higher score was simply she is so attractive and uses a lot of clothing fetish crossovers in her content - you are spot on the design of the two sites is virtually identical - but with FTV, despite the huge amount of content there weren't that many models I found all that attractive.
On a solo girl site I expected what I got - decent quality movies with an extremely attractive friendly and enthusiastic model.
A lot of the girls on FTV fell short of those expectations - and for me Alison was the biggest selling point of that site.
Saying that, these were the first couple of reviews I wrote, and weren't as detailed or as objective as I would like to think my reviews have come
|
09-03-07 12:04pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
