Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Toadsith (0)
|
Did you mean Naughty America's quantity of content is more than Cougars In Heat? Because you said the opposite - which to me would be all the reason in the world to charge more. As per my review I'm sure you know that I'm quite fond of Cougars In Heat. Granted there are other sites with more content per dollar, but this site delivers what it promises and messes about with different scenarios and models to keep the content fresh and interesting while staying within their niche. That is a tough feat to pull off.
I recently reviewed All Internal which is a very comparable site as it doesn't grant you access to its network of sites, is a quite specific niche and for all intents and purposes is a better site - especially technology wise (wonderful search engine, review system, et cetera). However that site gets a bit boring after awhile. As Cougars In Heat continues to grow and if they add a search engine and such - I could see rating it higher than All Internal in the future because it changes its scenarios and adds a bit of fantasy to the porn.
All in all, I honestly believe their price is justified and a good site shouldn't be put down for charging premium price when they provide premium, exclusive content.
|
03-17-08 02:05pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
malikstarks (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Toadsith :
I appreciate your reasoned response. Yes, I meant that NA has more content that CougarsinHeat (CIH). Also remember that in the comment I did agree with you that the content on CIH is slightly better (more and better pics, very slightly higher vid quality etc.). However I still don't think these differences are significant enough to justify the price. Remember this site charges MORE than NA does for a pretty massive network. The only way it could offset that imo was if it was bringing a particular niche to the table that is unique, or hard to find, but the premise of the site is pretty much the same as NA, many of the models are also the same.
I had no problem at all with your review though, as a standalone sight it more than holds it's own, and many of your points are justifiable.
|
03-19-08 11:28pm
Reply To Message
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|