Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

ALS Scan (0)

Newbie 97* turboshaft (0) 04-01-08  08:37pm          TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: + Tons of exclusive solo girl content, almost all archived + Lots of hot, amateur ladies...all shaved (lives up to the name) + Models do a lot: big insertions, fisting, speculum, many do peeing, some anal + Girl-girl action + Daily video update, photo update every other day + Quick downloads + Newer videos are HD, 2 res available for newer photos + All natural models, few porn stars Cons: They are minor, but... - Many videos are just photoshoots or BTS (can get boring), newer masturbation vids feel very forced and often fake - Site's being redesigned, but still needs a few tweaks - Many older models have no vids, few photos - A few too many European models Bottom Line: If you're into young, totally shaven girls who are willing to get nasty in front of a camera, then ALS Scan could easily become your new friend. This site shoots some very hot girls, many who have never done any porn or modeling prior, and a few who haven't done any since (that's exclusive!). The focus here is not just quantity, but quality, and new pics are offered in two sizes (around 1300x1000 and 3000x2000), usually with good lightning and crystal clear resolution. New videos are also in big, clear HD (1280x720). The owner/photographer doesn't mess around, and models are quickly undressed and lubed up in the scenes, with lots of toys, fisting, speculum, along with some models who pee, or do some anal; but only what they are comfortable doing, and it pays off in the photos. My only gripes would be that the videos can get boring, and the newer ones feel too forced if they are masturbation. Yeah, it’s porn, but their older vids would just introduce the model and let her go from there. The owner also frequently talks, even in the masturbation vids, and his voice can be quite annoying, and downright creepy (a frequent complaint by other users). They are also finally putting their old design out to pasture, but the new one isn't perfect (no searching, you can still end up doing a lot of clicking). But the content more than makes up for these things, and as older material is being rereleased and updated, you'll probably end up quite satisfied. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 williamj (0) excellent review once finish ALS try ALSAngels not as much matter but worth a few month membership I like their stuff... 04-03-08  05:57am Reply To Message 2 turboshaft (0) REPLY TO #1 - williamj : Yeah, I'll have to check it out some time. The thing I hate about ALS Scan is when the director's blog talks about a really hot model and then ends with saying she's going to be released on the Angels site instead. Frustrating, but it's hard to ignore some of the models, especially when they're included in regular ALS shoots (like Carli in their Caribbean '07 shoot). 04-04-08  08:18am Reply To Message 3 GCode (0) I know it's been awhile since you have reviewed or maybe been a member here but I have a question: I noticed you were the only one who really talked about what the content actually is that is provided. Therefore, I noticed you said speculums. So, since this is extreme spreading, do the models do any 'extreme' spreading with just their fingers or is it primarily insertions and the speculums? I hope this makes sense, or if you even remember. I assume you would because you like the site so much :) Anyways, I have been interested in ALS Scan for awhile now and I was told that this displays primarily more 'petite' models while ALS Angels is more of the 'thicker and busty' models? Any info from any of these questions would be great and I'd appreciate it a lot! 07-07-09  07:01pm Reply To Message 4 turboshaft (0) REPLY TO #3 - GCode : Well, as far as extreme spreading goes, it really depends on the model, but yes, generally they do it with fingers, not just toys and "devices". I would say about 90 to 95% of models use a speculum, and a few just choose not to, but the vast majority of them do use it in at least one scene. They all use toys (who doesn't?) and fingers, though I would say toys and other insertables get the maximum effect for the "quick pullout" shots they like to get, that is, where they get a temporary gape. :) And they love fisting, though that seemed to be tapering off slightly when I was last a member (December '08), but there is still plenty of it there. As far as ALS Scan vs ALS Angels goes, yes, it is pretty much petite (regular ALS) vs thick and busty (Angels), but it is a subtle difference unless you are into breasts. Older models -- say, from 1990s through early 2000s -- with big breasts (C and up) are on ALS, but after that, they are primarily all on Angels. A few of these Angels girls made it to the regular site for some girl-girl shoots and an occasional Caribbean trip -- like Carli did for their 2007 Caribbean trip -- but they stay mostly on ALS Angels. If you haven't been a member of either, and big breasts, or lack thereof, aren't a big deal, then I would recommend ALS Scan first. Yes, it is five dollars more, but there is so much more content there, due to archiving that goes way back, plus most of their content goes there, so they have more regular updates. I hope this helps, but I haven't been a member in seventh months :( so maybe starting a comment and asking for a second opinion would give you a better idea, as I am sure some of our regulars are current members. 07-07-09  11:05pm Reply To Message 5 GCode (0) REPLY TO #4 - turboshaft : Thanks a bunch that info was exactly what I was looking for in terms on a better idea of content and more clarification about the differences between the two sites. Appreciate the facts and I'm looking forward to joining the site eventually :) 07-08-09  09:41am Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.