| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
zman (0)
|
WMA is the easiest, but QuickTime and DIVX are good too. Its just a pain to have to have so many different programs!
|
03-09-07 08:27pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I said "Divx," but it's just a marginal choice between that and WMV. There are some WMV vids that are superior to some Divx. It comes down to quality in full-screen mode.
|
04-15-07 07:10am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
kkman112 (0)
|
WMV does not work well on linux. I prefer Xvid/Divx due to great quality for filesize, but will take quicktime or MPEG as well. Flash needs updated to compete. Will Silverlight bring that change?
|
05-05-07 01:01am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Gazette Risque (0)
|
Oh man, I just submitted this poll.
Guess I should have read every poll first.
My apologies to the PU Staff for submitting a useless poll.
Anyway, for me it depends on the quality of WMV.
If it's about 512k or higher I go with that, otherwise it's Divx/Xvid.
|
06-03-07 08:17pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
apoctom (0)
|
WMV is the only one that I know will be supported FOREVER because MS will be around that long. I would love to use an open format like DivX, but what happens when those developers find the next great thing?
|
07-11-07 09:07pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Schnitzel (0)
|
WMV, because it's simple.
It just plays, no need to install players (eg Quicktime) that I'd rather not install on the PC, or have to fiddle about with codecs.
I use WMP for playing music anyway, so it's the natural choice.
|
07-13-07 02:30am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
Doesn't matter much, as long as it's clear. avi, mpg, wmv and, yes, even mov. But, if I see rm's on a site, I'll generally stay away. Come to think of it, maybe the world's woken up - I haven't seen an rm in ages...
|
07-15-07 11:12pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
As long as it is HD, that is all I care.
|
05-23-20 03:19am
Reply To Message
|
