| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
malikstarks (0)
|
I'm personally not a fan of sites like this simply because of what you point out. Too much airbrushing of an already gorgeous model. The content here is somewhat overly processed, but I understand that's what most guy's like.
I certainly cannot argue with the gargantuan amount of content that is available here though.
|
04-13-08 10:45am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - malikstarks :
Probably the Playboy, Penthouse factor that makes many prefer the artificiality (over processing) of the pictures. I prefer natural flesh tones and a bit less glamor. As to the amount of contents, the site is huge all right but after the few times I did browse and download, mostly pictures, I did not keep one single set. I would still give the site high ratings, it delivers what it promises: glamor. I fully accept the blame for straying into something that was wrong for me. I should have had a thorough look at their preview first! I have been much more careful since then.
|
04-13-08 11:00am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
wiild1 (Unverified)
|
I agree on the landscape format! 99% of all pornpictures are either viewed on a computer screen or perhaps a TV screen:
sites/photographers/editors should adopt to this and make sure most pictures are in landscape format.
|
08-30-08 09:00am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - wiild1 :
Glad to see someone else feels that way, wild1!! Now if only the webmasters listened.
|
08-30-08 07:51pm
Reply To Message
|
