Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Twistys (0)

Newbie 80* messmer (0) 04-14-08  12:35pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review. Pros: +Large selection of attractive models. +Large selection of videos and picture sets. +Extremely fast download speed. +Excellent search engine. +True to its niche as glamor site. Cons: The pictures, the pictures, the pictures. They all remind me of the false glamor of Playboy and Penthouse .. limbs that seem to be powdered with orange make up, faces and bodies without blemish or pore, colors way too warm. Only a few sets show true more "coolish" body color. My personal peeve, as commented on in another spot: too few landscape type pics. The sets are numbing in their sameness: model standing up in dress, model standing up without dress, model standing up nude, a couple of isolated body parts (vagina, breasts, buttocks) added in "landscape" format, that's it. This reduced my score by at least 8 points. Bottom Line: Sorry, but I had to get the cons off my chest. The site is excellent for the young (I only found one model over forty!!) and for those who like Playboy type glamor (and silicone breasts) when it comes to their models. Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (6) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 Goldfish (0) Playboy glam is a perfect way to sum up this site. It would have been the best site on the Internet in the mid-80's -- if they had an Internet back then. 04-14-08  02:49pm Reply To Message 2 messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - Goldfish : No doubt in my mind, Goldfish! 04-14-08  03:53pm Reply To Message 3 WeeWillyWinky (0) Thanks for the review, messmer. 04-14-08  03:55pm Reply To Message 4 Monahan (0) Good review. The videos are well done and worth joining up, but the photos are as you say, not erotic at all. 04-14-08  05:05pm Reply To Message 5 messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #4 - Monahan : I personally thought the review was a bit short of facts, but thanks, Monahan. And I hope I did the site justice despite my disappointment with the pictures. 04-14-08  05:52pm Reply To Message 6 messmer (Disabled) REPLY TO #3 - WeeWillyWinky : You're welcome, WWW! Just keep in mind my subjectivity when it comes to good pictures. Not everyone is on my wave length. 04-14-08  05:54pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.