| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
The sites from this company are plagued with problems such as you describe. Just read the comments and reviews -- but skip the reviews that are obviously written by shills; there are several of those.
Frankly, I think those shill reviews should be wiped off of PornUsers with a strong industrial cleaning agent. They're an eyesore and they don't belong here.
|
04-26-08 02:43pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
jd1961 (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Yes... Like the great Markus:
TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (17)
This guy is the worst. He shills all these sites, and look at the score he gives the competition! LOL
https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1257
|
04-27-08 02:52am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - jd1961 :
Yes, it was a rather sickening experience, exchanging e-mails with this guy who's pretending not to be a representative of the company but just an ordinary user. I played along; wanted to see how well he could play the role without dropping little "tells" in his messages.
Lying tends to put people under stress because they have to keep covering their tracks, and the stress makes them vulnerable to slip ups. But his tracks were all over the place! LOL.
I must say, it was one of those times when the trust ratings really made a big difference.
Enjoy your crow, Markus.
|
04-27-08 04:45am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
jd1961 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :
But if you dig deep, you'll see that he suckered the poor webmaster from Twistys into a long argument over him giving Twistys (2 hotlinks!) a 57 score. I guess I didn't notice it at the time, or I would have clued the Twistys (there's 3) webmaster to this shill.
You may add your reply here:
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3118
|
04-27-08 05:03am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Denner (0)
|
If not scam - it's close, very close!
A lot of PUs - included this one - has warned about this site/pass in the past.
Nothing is exclusive here and most preview is, yes - totally scam. The content is at best worthless.
The reactions from a lot of PUs should NOW make TBP consider the score of 82,0.
That score is like giving this pass a seal of approval.
BTW, bunnypu - give it a shot with a review here! It'll be welcome.
|
04-27-08 06:57am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - jd1961 :
Either this guy is not for real (in the head) or some kind of "undercover agent for shitty sites".
Well, the trust score puts it in perspective - still it's waste of our time to have a PU like that....
|
04-27-08 07:13am
Reply To Message
|
