| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Thanks for pointing this out. I remember when this site was actually fresh -- several pattern-baldness years earlier! One may notice that the NET227 sites are, with the possible exceptions of Shay Laren and Lisa Daniels, fraught with moribundity!
BTW, since you're interested in Anita Dark (quite understandable), you may wish to avoid Planet Anita, which has really poor quality stuff. I joined it twice, last time in 2006, and it was to the web what a fossil is to a layer of shale.
|
05-04-08 12:38pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
BTW, at The Best Porn, it was first listed in Dec. 2004. However, I know that the site came into existence earlier that year, as it was the same year that ClubJanaCova came out (early 2004).
|
05-04-08 12:57pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
atrapat (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :
That could make things worse and the site might not have received more than a handful of updates in 4 years. That could explain also why most videos are MPEG. I am not familiar with the model and I had never seen any of the galleries so I couldn't really tell what year exactly they were taken.
I assumed most of the content had been uploaded together in 2006 because one of the latest galleries was from her "new movie"; I looked up the title and it had been released in 2006. All the preceding updates had almost the same day and month and that's why I thought they all might be part of the original content.
Anyway, whether they are from 2004 or 2006, anyone joining should not expect any recent content.
|
05-04-08 01:53pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
atrapat (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Thanks for the Planet Anita heads up. I believe it should have almost the same content and at the same resolutions that eventually appear at Club Anita. Someone at the Club Anita forums complained, though, that Planet Anita had much more BTS/personal material than Club Anita. It certainly has a real diary updated more often and with more meaningful entries although it is already available in the free section.
Planet Anita, at least, doesn't try to fool you in the website tour: I feel that what you get once you join is what you see in the free section.
Very few of the Glamour Models Gone Bad are alive and kicking and the website tours are specially misleading: they look super cool and promise great content and interaction with the model but, once inside, you get a very old looking design, questionable quality and the promised interaction with the model is a bad joke. Apart from the ones you say, Club Charlie (Charlie Laine) still seems to live up to the promises.
|
05-04-08 01:58pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - atrapat :
Jesse was a sensation earlier in the decade. I've got stuff of her from Danni.com (745 pixels, anyone?), Digital Desire (when it was Digital Dreamgirls), FTV Girls, and Bikini Riot. Most of it in pics is no larger than 1024px, though Digital Desire actually does a lot of re-issued content and has re-done a bit of her in 1280.
In fact, when Shae Marks had a website, Jessie was there, too.
There's even some really early stuff of her at MattsModels and ATK Archives when she looked a lot more natural and innocent and not so made-over and trashy vixen-like. But it's old stuff quality-wise.
Thanks for the heads up on the Charlie Laine site having more "currency" than the aging material on a few of the other NET227 sites.
|
05-04-08 03:08pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :
I remember when Jesse Capelli used to do weekly cam shows at Misha's cam network when her site was new and active. I could tell it was going way downhill in the last days of her public forum, which I checked now and then. The poor members were complaining about the lack of updates, Jesse's posts in response were bitchy as hell - all "What do you expect? I'm busy!"
|
05-04-08 11:17pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - PinkPanther :
On the porn sites, we want the women to be as we'd like them to be, not as they tend to be in real life! At least not that bad!
|
05-05-08 01:55am
Reply To Message
|
