Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
Good review. I've always seen Society Sm's ads as a much poorer quality (especially the photography) than Kink.com or Fucked & Bound, Chanta's Bitches, etc. .....
and even though I was tempted, I kept putting off joining and joined many other sites instead. Your review confirms what I suspected. The poor camera work on their preview indicates what's inside. Thanks!
By the way, if you like spanking and red assed cute girls at about $20/mo, I found a bargain site called "Dallas Spanks Hard". No sex, though, only good, hard spanking.
|
05-15-08 07:35pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
apoctom (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Jay G :
Thanks for the compliment and suggestion. I will look into it.
|
05-15-08 09:25pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
asmith12 (0)
|
> it really bombed out on update frequency
IMHO once per week is definitely not bad for this kind of content. Same SexAndSumbission and FuckedAndBound you're referring to have 1 update per week too (SexAndSumbission sometimes gives "BONUS UPDATES" out of schedule but they're as they sound - irregular bonus updates once in a while). Or "Society SM" has it less frequent than once a week?
|
05-16-08 08:59am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
apoctom (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - asmith12 :
My quote refers to my scoring rubric. On a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being daily updates, I scored Society SM a 5 for weekly updates.
I agree that this update schedule is about the same for all of these types of sites, but IMHO all of them could update more frequently (even 2 scenes per week would be a great improvement).
Thanks for the comment.
|
05-16-08 10:16am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - apoctom :
> even 2 scenes per week would be a great improvement
Sure it would be, but (taking into account that NOBODY does it for this niche) is it realistic to expect it? Among other things, it would increase their cost 2-fold but will it bring them 2x more customers? I doubt so.
|
05-16-08 10:34am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
apoctom (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - asmith12 :
> Among other things, it would increase their cost 2-fold but will it bring them 2x more customers? I doubt so.
That's where I think we have two different viewpoints. I don't think that it would cost 2x more because of economies of scale.
I do think it will increase their customers. Maybe not double their customers, but it should be enough to offset any increases in costs. I have to imagine that they are making pretty good money charging $30/month right now, too.
|
05-16-08 10:42am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
asmith12 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - apoctom :
Well, let's hope they will hear you :-).
|
05-16-08 10:48am
Reply To Message
|