| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I actually joined this site not too long ago. Don't bother. It's not even worth the $10 membership I paid for it. The zips didn't work, the photo quality was mediocre and sometimes poor, the women tended to be rather masculine-looking or aged, and the photosets were often rather small. Out of 8 months or so of content buildup, I got just one photoset that I thought was satisfactory, and I had to cherry-pick it because the zip wouldn't download.
In short, I was very disappointed. A good sandwich with a side and a drink would have been a better way to spend that $10.
I didn't bother to review it. Waste of time.
It's NOTHING like MetArt. MetArt leaves it completely in the dust.
|
05-15-08 02:48pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Toadsith (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Looking through the preview photos, I gotta agree with you - it looks like they are using seriously sub par equipment. My $700 DSLR takes photos that are just as good. One really needs to foot the bill for a proper camera if they want to be METArt 2.0.
|
05-16-08 12:11am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Thanks for that warning, bro!
I must admit the style and concept seems a bit phoney too...
|
05-16-08 12:58am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :
Hey Drooler, I'd say go ahead and post a review on this one even though it's been a while since you were a member. I found this site looking at an outside review site and was tempted until I checked here. Several sites have given this one a high rating. For me, it means more when I see a review as opposed to just a comment. After relying on good ol' PU I think I'll pass on this one for now.
|
08-14-08 11:58am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Wittyguy :
Well, we can both spend our time on things more worthwhile. The site's a piece of shit, and the positive reviews of it are, too. It really, really sucked. Glad I only wasted $10 on it.
|
08-14-08 01:18pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :
I hear ya. My only reason for bringing up the issue of posting a review or comment was the fact that TBP has no review of this site and Denner's comment (the only one posted) doesn't mention the price gouging. I thought others might want to be forewarned more clearly is all.
|
08-14-08 03:58pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Wittyguy :
I see your point. Hopefully people will read the replies here and take note. On those positive reviews, I'll just say that most of the review sites I've seen (and I've got quite a few bookmarked) I don't really trust. Too many of them take the tone of promotions and not reviews. I just use them to get info and maybe find new sites, but PU is about the only place I know of where the reviews are mostly on the level.
It would be hard for me to do any kind of decent review now anyway. I didn't take notes on the site during the subscription and I don't recall much at all in the way of detail. Reply #5 here is pretty much what it would be.
I'd rather just forget that it exists.
|
08-14-08 11:32pm
Reply To Message
|
