Review Replies (3)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
A fair and detailed review, exotics4me, even though I gave the site a much higher rating. But that's where individual tastes come in and that's why I appreciate reviewers like you. You give all the pertinent details and will steer those who share your taste in a direction more suitable for them without knocking a site that's not quite your cup of tea. BTW, not sure if you will feel the same way I do, given our differences but while you are there download the g/g video (three parts) of Page and Rachelle (could be listed under Rachelle and Page). Rachelle's orgasm is the most realistic I have ever seen in all my porn travels. She's awkward, inexperienced with women, and so genuine and appealing that I marked the three segments: do not delete! :-)
|
07-19-08 03:56pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
exotics4me (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - messmer :
Hey messmer,
Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them.
I will tell you a few of the girls I really liked on this site. I thought Pam, reddish/blonde hair was really cute, nice body too. Luna has a great body. Loved Lili and her red hair and freckles. Bridgette reminds me of Erica Campbell and my two favorites were Fluer and Lola. Those girls really caught my attention, especially Lola.
The thing that bothered me though, as much as I dislike lots of pubic hair, if the girl is pretty enough, I can deal with it, but hairy armpits are something that I've never been around, ever. That almost goes into too shocking for me. And several of the g/g sets had girls with hairy armpits.
Not that I think there is anything wrong with it, but it just doesn't fit my ideal of a fantasy woman. I will check that one out that you mentioned, made a notepad note here.
I remember talking to Snowdude last year about the areas we were raised in, and I was raised just outside of Los Angeles, beaches, blondes, bikinis everywhere I looked. So, I do like "regular" girls as well, as a contrast to my raising. One of my strongest fetishes is a woman in a long skirt with a tight sweater on, since I never saw women like that growing up. So, I can appreciate this site for the niche it is and as mentioned in the review, I really do applaud them for sticking to it.
Thanks for the tip on the Rachelle and Page videos and the reply. Will let you know how I liked them.
|
07-19-08 09:04pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - exotics4me :
exotics4me wrote:
"Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them."
messmer's reply:
Yep, that's why I believe a very short review of any site is next to useless. Because every user's taste is so different, (I love hair and have just resubscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy) it is important to give as many details as possible about the contents of a given site.
Quality is very important but the contents are even more so because you might find yourself stuck with a site for a month (or three) that you find terribly boring. Happened to me a few times, Twisty's and ATK Galleria being two recent examples. They are quality sites, most people love them but they couldn't have been farther from what I was looking for. :-) So thanks again for making it so clear to folks about what to expect. Hope new reviewers will read and follow your lead.
|
07-20-08 09:01am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
